Digimon, but DragonBall Z broke me out of it.

IF he existed, he was a great philospher, pacifist, and humanitarian. The "son of god" stuff would be added later.

otherwise option D.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-iV2q-W9BE

Han Solo shoots and kills Greedo before he even gets a shot off.

It was edited to be more "kid friendly." That way Han Solo's morality wouldn't be questioned... it wasn't muder it was self defense.

I'm not going to read your post (just woke up), but you shouldn't be living by anyone's standards than your own.

What are people views on Anarchism? I don't really understand how it would work. I mean sure 'in theory' it could work, but I think the main problems are:

- What would the dis-incentive be for people not to kill one another, steal, etc. Likewise, what the incentive be for anyone to aid someone who was under attack by someone else?

- How would people trade without a currency of fixed value, relulated by the state? Yes, people could barter, but for what?

- How would education and health care be provided?

These are just some of the problems I see with it; could probably think of more. So yeah, don't really get the people who advocate Anarchism.

icy06

No government normally would mean that there wouldn't be an organized society.

Education/Health Care ON YOUR OWN

No currency- one person has something you want, you have something they want, then you trade those things. What for- food, clothing, tools, shiny stuff, whatever the hell you want.

Other than general morality there would be no dis-incentive.

John Wilkes Booth of course

EDIT: also may have been Comedian

I didn't take pre-calc before calc. None of my class did.

Got to go with Hot Fuzz, both are great though.

Well the next night the question was "If you have 4 shirts and 3 pairs of pants, how many combinations of 1 shirt and 1 pair of pants can you have?" That gave the "celebrity" (dammit can't remember her name Country singer, red hair) She had just about as much trouble as Patricia Heaton.