@CharlieSpot She made games with existing people. I doubt she'll get the license anyway since it has a negative portrayal of those characters. Nintey and Capcom only sell rights when a project help market their games :)
@CharlieSpot And notice, you're picking on the folks who are eloquent and have made excellent remarks about the article when you should be filtering the comments which address Antia's person rather than her points. Nice job there.
@CharlieSpot I don't control JR Rowling like I don't control Capcom like I don't control Namco like I don't control Nintendo like I don't control Eidos and the million other company there.
@CharlieSpot I said that and I see nothing wrong with it. I don't like JK Rolwing's tackle of wizards; theme, I go and write my own story not ask JK Rowling to change hers just to appeal to me. :)
I see attempts by admins cough *charliespot" cough, to make this discussion look as if it's liberals against conservatives when it's not. Every single person here knows that Anita Sarkisian has EVERY right to complain about the way women look in video games. Those who are arguing against her points, myself included, respect her opinion and her right to complain about it, and we're merely expressing our disagreement. Please don't not derail from the topic and keep off the Personal Thrashing. We're discussing games and this is supposed to be fun. Again, we're all here fully aware that Anita has a right to complain. Happy discussing.
@zyxe @Michael83917 Requesting for a future project yes absolutely! But requesting that other women change the way they look which is what the game is about since it has existing female characters from video games is lack of tolerance.
@zyxe @Deevoshun That's not true. Then you obviously haven't played enough games with women in them. and I advice you to not judge those women based on their appearance. A woman wearing a bikini might be more developed as a character and more powerful than a covered one.
gamingqueen's comments