You obviously don't know what you just typed.Guys .... my OP is very clear, we all know the x360 failure rate reached more than 50% at some time ..... which is higher than any console ever, may be any machine ever.
Wii also brings money, PS3 is starting is bring money :D, but the x360 value is just too crappy to put it in any credible lists of good consoles.
2mrw
genaroll's forum posts
[QUOTE="coasterguy65"]
[QUOTE="TehNubTuber"] What can I say...
TehNubTuber
What does a Panda on a kids toy have to do with haters?
Dude how can you not get it :P
He won't get it becausedata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/116a9/116a9556608b59c1e0668a2a65a7894bdd5586d2" alt=""
Your last sentence just,it just,just does that.Who cares about the amount of A games on the console. The fact is no one gives a flying hoot about perfect dark zero, motorstorm 1, and any game in 2006-2007. Should we be impressed that games like pgr3 were decent 3 years ago, or the fact that forza 3 is superior to forza 2 making it completely useless game? I despise irrational counting more and more. I would recommend more playstation 3 games than xbox 360 games thus making it a better console. Plain and simple. It had the better line up in the last 2 years.
nhh18
If microsoft left..I would leave gaming..JamaniJust like how you left that 2k10 match i was about to beat you in yesterday.
BC was a standard feature of the PS3 systems, and then those older consoles were discontinued and new SKUs didn't have the BC come standard. That feature was inherently removed from those consoles. Now, Sony does not manufacture any PS3 with BC. It was removed.because people want their cake and eat it too. When the ps3 1st came out with them, "it was too expensive", then when they decides to drop the price, but not bleed as much as they already was with the ps3 cost, and drop the BC feature, people are now like "Why drop the BC feature?" It's almost like no matter what sony does, they'll get bashed for it. I guess that's what happens when you have an awful start and have reason for nay-sayers to bash. When their problem is fixed, they'll find new reasons to bash. Sony never had to get rid of it,they just wanted to take out features from a system that shouldn't have cost that much.[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]
They didn't remove BC from its consoles. The versions that had BC still to this day have them. Its just some models didn't even come with it. So if you wanted BC so much, you should have forked up the money and got it when there was models available.
ermacness
1.Lol the 360 was always cheaper than the ps3 and had more features then the wii. 2.so i guess sony never did this too. 3.they never knew about rrod at first they just put it out. 4. and 5how is extending a warranty bad and they already fixed the issue. 6.sony and microsoft. 7.microsoft or nintendo.Which company sells a console with less features, but at same price as competitor?
Which company adds features that were on other consoles 4 years prior and gets hype for it?
Which company sales a console with KNOWN issues just to make it to market prior toother consoles?
Which company extends warranty on its consolesinstead of actually fixing the issue?
Which company sales a gimped version of a console, for onlyits purchasers find out later they need tobuy hardware to get the full experience or even to play some games on that console?
Which consoles make subscription required for online play but doesn't guarantee dedicated servers?
Which company can remove features and still have more features than the competitor?
GreyFoXX4
Log in to comment