gigantrax's forum posts

Avatar image for gigantrax
gigantrax

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2  Edited By gigantrax
Member since 2014 • 63 Posts
@davillain- said:

@Bread_or_Decide: Doesn't Nintendo youtube program only takes very small of revenue from youtubers but not exactly all of it? I mean, fair is fair right?

lol.. again.. please watch this video by totalbiscuit.. it explains this in detailed from the time Phil Fish tried this stunt.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzeULO59hG0&feature=youtu.be&t=11m56s

Avatar image for gigantrax
gigantrax

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3  Edited By gigantrax
Member since 2014 • 63 Posts

Well.. guys just watch it for 5 minutes... https://youtu.be/FzeULO59hG0?t=11m56s by Total Biscuit

Avatar image for gigantrax
gigantrax

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#4  Edited By gigantrax
Member since 2014 • 63 Posts

@goldenelementxl said:

It's gonna happen regarding video games. "Content Creators" are basically stealing the work of developers and profiting from it. Can I show clips from an NFL game while analyzing it on a Youtube channel? No, my ass would have been sued immediately. Once publishers unite over a stance and how to enforce it, it's game over. Without video game footage, Angry Joe wouldn't have a channel. People are there for the games, while his persona is just an added bonus. I think he's a likable guy with some genuinely funny moments. But without showing the work of video game developers, nobody would be watching his videos. And why shouldn't developers or publishers profit from his videos? He's showing their work and making himself and Youtube money in the process.

The gaming industry is behind the ball here, but don't worry. The suits will straighten this all out eventually.

lol.. That's never going to happen. This is a specific problem with Japanese publishers like Capcom and Nintendo and Sega. No. Publisher in USA does this kind of shit.

Avatar image for gigantrax
gigantrax

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5  Edited By gigantrax
Member since 2014 • 63 Posts

@goldenelementxl said:

So you ignored the 40 reviews for 1 2 Switch and only go by Angry Joes review? You seem to be sourcing him a lot too.

Are you Angry Joe???????

lol.. I'm not Angry Joe. The discussion is literally named after Angry Joe so I'm citing him. I can cite a couple of Total Biscuit videos on this topic like- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8D_Vyca69TE and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qj6jREPcp10

The most important one- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzeULO59hG0

@Thunderdrone said:

Man, I'd pay good money to see someone make a monetized channel where they review AJ reviews and Let's Watch his Lets Plays by simply dumping his video content and talking over it. Its transformative AND its journalism tecnically.

Like, literally a pocket change shitty ass production where someone just talks over or film themselves looking at his ANGRY skits. Imagine if it got as many views. Bet his team would love it lmao

Oh god, I'd love it if this became a valid career option thing on Youtube. Perfectly encapsulates the stupidity of Youtube businesses and the ticking time bomb that 90% of these channels have strapped on their foreheads.

Well.. Just like Digital Homicide tried to do with Jim Sterling.. coz that went well for Digital Homicide.. They're literally defunct now.

Avatar image for gigantrax
gigantrax

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6 gigantrax
Member since 2014 • 63 Posts

@goldenelementxl said:
@gigantrax said:

1. Well. I didn't know 1-2 switch was that bad. If not for Joe, I would obviously had bought it.

P.S- An average consumer doesn't have unlimited money. 60 dollars is still a big deal.

You could have checked almost ANY coverage of 1 2 Switch to learn it was a bad game. So don't credit Joe for deterring your ignorance.

Ok last thing. Jesus. I stopped viewing aggregate sites like metacritic after the Star Trek the Video game debacle. Another angry joe video about that issue https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZB7r9m9vYNA

Avatar image for gigantrax
gigantrax

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#7 gigantrax
Member since 2014 • 63 Posts

OK. brothers and sisters.. My train is at the station. This was a funny discussion. I heard forums are great time pass. Lol.. Bye..

Avatar image for gigantrax
gigantrax

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8 gigantrax
Member since 2014 • 63 Posts

@goldenelementxl said:

Joe doesn't care about what you play or buy. If Joe didn't make money doing this, he would be doing something else. Joe wants your clicks, subs and likes. Nothing more. Joe doesn't know you and doesn't care about you. The fact that you are so enchanted by this man is alarming.

So is Trump. lol..

Avatar image for gigantrax
gigantrax

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By gigantrax
Member since 2014 • 63 Posts

@Thunderdrone said:
@vfighter said:

Anybody taking Nintendo's side on this is beyond insane.

Who said anything about picking sides?

He has a LONG history of complaining that Copyright strikes shouldn't happen because "99% of other companies don't do this to me".

Was it last year or two years ago he had a meltdown because Nintendo flagged his Let's Plays? Only to do what? The exact same shit weeks later.

Now he is back at it. Knowing this is a thing that happens despite most companies letting it slide because he is big enough. Thing is, this understanding where one company stops charging the other in hopes that they get free publicity, isn't a deal you are entitled to. No one owes him a free pass, yet he keeps coming back with monetized rant videos over and over like clockwork... almost as if he found a way to make money off of a situation he has no moral high ground to stand lol

-He could be creative with his nintendo reviews to bypass CC.

-He could open a non monetized channel and ask for donations.

-He could do minimum coverage and not monetize.

-He could become a "Nintendo partner".

-Or he could periodically bitch and moan that Nintendo should leave him alone as others do because he is doing "them a solid", pretending its about some mutual benefit morals when in truth he feels he shouldn't abide by the rules of paying for owned content in order to embelish his business.

He chose the last. Go figure. Its funny because his tune changed actually. He is a lot more soft spoken this time around after being laughed at and smacked around in other forums for the tone he decided to go in his original Nintendo rants! The whole "is it right or wrong, its for you to decide" crap he now says wasnt around when he was hoping to garner sympathy in his earlier DRAMA videos. Its almost as IF.... he either realized no one hows Youtube businesses charity work or thought "shit, this is not sticking! Better backtrack". Its hilarious!

Its kind of his thing to create a PSA video. That makes him money and warns other youtubers. 3 strikes can get your channel killed.

PSA = Public Service Announcement

Avatar image for gigantrax
gigantrax

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10 gigantrax
Member since 2014 • 63 Posts

@Bread_or_Decide said:

Why didn't youtube help sales of titanfall 2? Everyone said it's worth playing and is way better than the first. And yet...crappy sales nonetheless. Where was joe's incredible powers then?

Because people were burned by titanfall in the past. Its practically a defunct game on PC right now.