how am i off topic? i just answered your question. I answered you question about lbp and you asked me about the short commings of the ps3 and i did that as well. then i asked you to do the same thing and you can't, why?

sorry i quoted myself it was a msiutake. i do not know ifLBP won GOTY here but it did win on a ton of other sites. also some shortcommings of the ps3 is that home is boring without friendthat like it. while online is free it desperately needs cross game chat. i hate having to usecross gametext on my ps3.ps3 needs more high quality RPGs. Now can you do the same for the 360.

[QUOTE="godsendBLISS"]

[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]

You don't need to bash a certain system just because its developers don't focus on a particular genre, just play Wii (in this case), it offers a lot of platformers.

Maybe Microsoft wanted to give the customers the best online experience possible, in stead of concentrating on pointless platformers that no one will play anyway?

SHR3DD3D

Admit it, there is a secret motive with this thread. You didn't just want to discuss the problem that the 360 lacks high-quality platformers, but bashing the system also makes you feel good for a reason, right? I can't really quote that message in this big thread, but I saw you writing that it was a bad system for not having as many high-quality platformers as Wii.

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="godsendBLISS"]

no actually it was on the third page. and u questionMY honesty and integrety? now as for ur claims, show me where i did this. my point stands. furthermore, i dont understand why the 360 owners became so argumentive and defensive in the first place. i asked a friggin question, and instead of an answer, i got bombareded, and accused of all kinds of nonsense. this wasn't a thread of ps3 vs 360, but the fact remains that the box doesn't have platform franchises anymore. that sucks. sure the ps3 doesnt have many as well, but it has a few, at least. microsoft could have had a new psychonauts, banjo, or conker, and we wouldnt be having this discussion.so the original question stands. why?

godsendBLISS

[QUOTE="godsendBLISS"]

boy this is like pulling teeth. look man, if kameo was as succesful as it should have been on the 360, then why don't we have a sequel. nut and bolts is an attempt, but it should nhave been a pure platformer. shadow complex IS NOT a platform game. i ackowledge kam and nutz and bolts, but microsoft sure isnt too thrilled to make a sequel. i really wish they would. games like those would be nice additions to the library. i think that sequels would be inbound if they it was more of a demand for them. hence the whole point of this thread.

waltefmoney

So you already know the answer? Then what was the point of making this thread?

[QUOTE="godsendBLISS"]

[QUOTE="Supabul"]

Yeah the PS3 has LBP and Ratchet, one has sloppy controls with poor gameplay and the other plays more like a cute TPS

360 has banjo the platformer with crazy vechile building underrated game if you ask me

Your question should be at both PS3 and 360 users

I don't think I have to make a list as to why the Wii is platformer king this gen

SHR3DD3D

You don't need to bash a certain system just because its developers don't focus on a particular genre, just play Wii (in this case), it offers a lot of platformers.

Maybe Microsoft wanted to give the customers the best online experience possible, in stead of concentrating on pointless platformers that no one will play anyway?

[QUOTE="godsendBLISS"]

no actually it was on the third page. and u questionMY honesty and integrety? now as for ur claims, show me where i did this. my point stands. furthermore, i dont understand why the 360 owners became so argumentive and defensive in the first place. i asked a friggin question, and instead of an answer, i got bombareded, and accused of all kinds of nonsense. this wasn't a thread of ps3 vs 360, but the fact remains that the box doesn't have platform franchises anymore. that sucks. sure the ps3 doesnt have many as well, but it has a few, at least. microsoft could have had a new psychonauts, banjo, or conker, and we wouldnt be having this discussion.so the original question stands. why?

waltefmoney

So why does the 360 not have any platform games that are exclusive, only on disc, scored 9.5 or above, have at least 3 games in the series, released on a tuesday between the hours of 3 and 7, have nothing but vowels in the name, developed by a company that only makes racing games, includes every language including ancient Sumarian, uses 3-d tech but without the need of glasses or even a TV, forged by the souls of lost puppies, that is on a disc made from recycled flowers and rainbows???

Seriously this thread is funny. The TC has been proven wrong so many different times in this thread but he just tries to add something new.

rybe1025

Yeah the PS3 has LBP and Ratchet, one has sloppy controls with poor gameplay and the other plays more like a cute TPS

360 has banjo the platformer with crazy vechile building underrated game if you ask me

Your question should be at both PS3 and 360 users

I don't think I have to make a list as to why the Wii is platformer king this gen

Supabul