hearsofironthre's forum posts

Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts

if i were a cow I woudlnt be bragging about a game which cant even do 2 player OFFLINE coop. So yes they have better graphics but guess what?

Halo reach has 4 player online coop, **** forge mode, theatre mode, massive maps in 16 man large battles, etc

So i dont see how any cow would prefer the 5hr long campaign and generic online...

Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
and guess what halo 3 reach owns it in gameplay, number of modes, number of players online, AI, different types of weapons, vehicles, enemies, etc pretty much EVERY LAST THING except graphics
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
halo 3 outsold all those combined LOL
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
so are you cows saying you woudl rather have killzone's graphics over halo reach's features? Seriously Killzone 3 cant even do 2 player OFFLINE coop right without lag/frame drops. I never understood why people make these threads, theres a reason why killzone 2 has like 200 ppl online right now to reach's 100,000
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
why are they advertizing features which 5% or less ppl even have?(move) and SUPER WHY are they advertising features literly maybe 100 people have (3d tv)...
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts

We'll see how it is when Killzone 3 finally releases. It's unfortunate that GG decided to release the game to devs so early, since there is going to be a massive day 1 patch changing things based on player feedback from the Beta/Demo.

Heck, they are even adding in unranked custom games for Kz3, but that couldn't be on the disk that reviewers got. Killzone 3 will be a 9.0+ game when it's released to us, but reviewers got essentially the "unfinished" product when they reviewed it. Not the smartest move by GG, but it shows that people can't always rely on reviews to judge a game.

xYamatox
+ you think having a custom unranked gametype would propell it to 9.0? Maybe for sony games its an impressive feat but that was included in HALO ONE back in 2001.( online it was in halo 2 that was only in 2004 so I give GG some props there )
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
happy to see LBP2 selling so crappy LOL 4th place hahahahaha
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"][QUOTE="LucidJubilation"]

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"] that inconsistent thing you talking about were the graphics, which many unbiased sources said that it would be a joke to bash the GT5 graphics as a whole anyway. now, lets talk about halo graphics on xbox360, that was one area that all halo fans were dissapointed with,modifed Halo2 engine,but it didnt matter, didnt it?nope, but it didmatter forgt5? yup, it did.

i didnt see many people(besides cows) disappointed in Reach's graphics. for a semi-open world fps the graphics were damn amazing. its not like it was linear with set pieces...these were big levels, a big world.

thinking reach graphics were going to be impressive before seeing in action in real life i was only fooled yet again. dont go there, thats one area you dont want to talk about halo on x360. want to praise it for being the most popular game, go head, i will agree with that.

Halo reach's graphics are amazing wtf ru talking about? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEE3GOk22Lw&feature=player_embedded#at=11 whats wrong with those graphics? this isnt a 6 hr shooter with no substance, that game has 4 player ONLINE coop + firefight + 16 man custom matches , etc
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
[QUOTE="OB-47"]

LOL Idc what you said, Halo is the one of the greatest FPS of all time as well as Half Life 2, Counter-Strike Source and Bioshock

ZoomZoom2490
there is a astronomical gap between HL2 sp and Halo sp. mp can be found in many games today, you dont need halo. cod beat halo this gen anyway, so dont praise it that much.

first of all lets compare halo 2 to HL2 as they were both in 2004, secondly halo 2's online multplayer sparked a revolution in console gaming that has yet to be matched. It literly created the online revolution of every single big game that sold a lot this gen ( call of duty, halo, gears of war,) . Without halo 2 and its matchmaking system + its ability to allow friends to play together who knows where online gaming in consoles would be.
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"] what content is this you talking about? i played halo3, odst and reach. there is nothing there but the same old engine from original xbox game with improved mp, ill give you that, mp is the only thing that has improved. But please dont brag about the story in halo3, odst and reach.LucidJubilation

Did I mention story no I didn't. Reach has firefight, forge, theater, split screen co-op, 4 player online co-op, split screen online play and more online modes than KZ3 has. KZ3 doesn't have as many features as halo does.

this guy gets it...KZ3 barely has any of what he listed. it doesnt even have a firefight or online co-op...or even 4 player co-op lol. thats why i've said before that the 8.5 rating it got was generous. if games are rated in comparison to the games already released, Reach being it, than KZ3 is severely lacking in content. no substance like i said...not because i played the game and went 'meh'. just because from what i've heard, seen, and read of it there's not much to it. unless reviewers are leaving huge chunks of content out of their reviews i feel i'm just in my thinking.

Dude read the review, it has 2 player OFFLINE coop which is laggy and unplayable. Halo 1 had that back in 2001 on the original xbox...