just so everyone here including cows know if sony COULD charge for PSN this minute they would do it. The problem is if they started charging it would be no where near as good as XBL in terms of simplicity and sheer content. PSN is amazing just because its free, no one in there right mind would pay for the current PSN and sony would have shot themselves in teh foot. BUT if they can get there new PSN up to date and make it as streamlined as XBL than I see no reason for them not to charge.
Killzone 3 is 5-6 hours long, corridor linear shooter. It has 2 player OFFLINE Co-op which is laggy and unplayable as it suffers from extreme frame drops and such(read the review its all listed there) There is one type of enemy with differnet armor on... HALO ONE is a 7-9 hour linear shooter that incorporates human and covanent vehicles, weapons ranging from snipers, rockets, plasma pistols, sticky gernades, plasma rifle,etc and has 2 player OFFLINE coop that works perfectly. The enemies vary immensly in height, skill, armor, size, and actual rank in the cannon universe. Hey it can almost compete with halo 1!!!
and uncharted 2 is a 8 hour game with average multiplayer and no replayablilty. Congradulations IGN themseleves made an entire article mentinong at how ME2>UC2
killzoneand resistance are horribly unoriginal and boring. PS home is the lames thing ive ever seen.
little big planet, demon souls, MGS4, Heavy Rainand uncharted are very good though IMO.
taterfrickintot
mgs4 is good only if you like that genre heavy rain lol at $60 purchase uncharted 2- this is the one ps3 exclusive i would consider paying $60 for. Until I realize how crap the online is compared to better TPS and that the singleplayer is only worth a rent. LBP2 i really liked the demo ill see if i buy it or not
What I ask is how could Black Ops (aka Lag Ops) score a 9.0 on GG when the game has unreliable connection, overpowered killstreak, gunship which kills with two bullets, the single player? The enemy has a weapons of MASS DESTRUCTION we must kill them and SAVE THE WORLD and lifes of thousands of innocents! Oh and the russians are the bad guys...AGAIN! Why did Black Ops deserve a 9.0 and why didn?t Killzone 3 deserve a 8.5 TC? **** online, same BS campaign, only thing good to the game is ZOMBIES, and that`s not orginial either is it? Tell me why do COD games score 9s when they are basically the SAME damn thing. It has been running on the same engine since COD4 damn it. *runs to the kitchen, takes a COLD glass water*
NWA90s
um Lag ops is only because PSN sucks. Same with why MW2 is LITERLY unplayable. A game that sold 6million on the PS3 is unplayable because of how suprior PSN is to XBL On the 360 black ops is heaven, no lag, nothing. On PSN its laggy as crap. buh buh activiosns
People hate on killzone 1 because it sucked People hate on killzone 2 because it was flat out boring and again supposed to be a halo killer ( LOL) People hate on killzone 3 because its a worse version of blackops except the 2 player offline coop is laggy and buggy
Theres 100,000 people + on at ANYTIME for halo reach. Thats more than unchrated 2, Mgs4 online, killzone 1 , 2, psp killzone all combined. So how many map packs have htose games had?
[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"][QUOTE="hearsofironthre"][QUOTE="mrmusicman247"] The reason why everyone skipped it is because it's just not true. So killzone 3's OFFLINE 2 player co-op is 100% playable while halo 1 for xbox original in 2001 is unplayable? and halo 3 and halo reach's online + offline 4 player campaign mode is unplayable? I was talking about the graphics. :lol: How is large frame drops and laggy offline campaign mode not part of the graphics? You consider graphics simple textures?
Log in to comment