hearsofironthre's forum posts

Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
[QUOTE="hearsofironthre"]so everyone skipped over the part where I prove the graphics are not impressive on Killzone? also LOL at the guy who was talking about infamous, that game was the biggest POS boring crap ive ever played. The demo I was nearly crying at how boring it wasmrmusicman247
The reason why everyone skipped it is because it's just not true.

So killzone 3's OFFLINE 2 player co-op is 100% playable while halo 1 for xbox original in 2001 is unplayable? and halo 3 and halo reach's online + offline 4 player campaign mode is unplayable?
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
When you play 2 play OFFLINE co-op it lags like hell, suffers immesly from frame drops, and is essentially unplayable. Now halo 1 for the original xbox in 2001 had that feature and it worked flawlessly It seems a 5 hour linear corridor shooter is all Killzone is, so enjoy it
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
so everyone skipped over the part where I prove the graphics are not impressive on Killzone? also LOL at the guy who was talking about infamous, that game was the biggest POS boring crap ive ever played. The demo I was nearly crying at how boring it was
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
I never understood this. How can a game like Killzone 3 get an 8.5 when TONS of people flat out say the campaign is boring (which killzone 2's put everyone I know to sleep) and the worst part is People consider Killzone 3's graphics to be 10000x better than anything on the 360. Now killzone 3 is the best looking console game I would say BUT GUESS WHAT? its a 1 player linear, corridor shooter with a 5 hour singleplayer and 3 modes online... Guess what happens when Killzone 3 tries to do OFFLINE 2 player co op? Its buggy and **** as hell, with framerate drops everywhere. Now people alawys mentino how halo reach's graphics suck comapred to killzone 3 Halo reach has 4 player online+offline campaign mode, it has up to 16 players on forge mode at once, theatre mode, etc and why isnt the amazing halo reach engine talked about more? If killzone 3 cant even have 2 player OFFLINE co op like ***** halo 1 did in 2001 how on earth are people impressed? Honestly why would anyone play killzone 3 instead of black ops? The story is universally accepted to suck how is that "Alright"? How can a game get an 8.5 when the singleplayer is so flawed? The story doesnt just suck it actually takes away from the singleplayer ive seen multple reviews mention. The multiplayer has 3 modes and changes such few things and yet it gets an 8.5 WTF?
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
it was pretty obvious that ME2 killed uncharted 2, I mean come on uncharted is semi fun the first time and thats it. 8 hours later your done , why woudl anyone play the multiplayer when theres much better games in that genre?
Avatar image for hearsofironthre
hearsofironthre

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 hearsofironthre
Member since 2011 • 78 Posts
I remember that crap tutorial, but trust me you still wont know how to load troops onto transport ships or planes and stuff like that To get the best possible experience you need to buy the expansion pack no matter what. Even Very hard is a pushover in the normal HOI3 if your germany because you can simply buildup mass mass mass amnt of troops and just rape