Brings some good memories about AC, and that's why i mainly play the game. I feel that the game is relaxing and like if i were playing in a historic book.
And i don't like Desmond parts either, I just care for the main story of each game, Desmond story had a good reason at the beginning, but later it was just used to connect the games together and it became shallow.
I scroll down, and i find it very strange to talk about religion on the internet, specially on a gaming site. Beliefs are complicated thing and aren't mainly the matter of debate on the internet.
I'm muslim, I respect my religion and I respect the beliefs of others, I meet lots of people on the internet, some who are really respectful and whom i like without knowing where they are from or what their beliefs are, others whom, lets say i don't get along with very well. I really always think of the internet as the country that has no boundaries.
And I think that mainly MW2 is played now by lots of muslims (Not from here anyway , I'm from Egypt, but from other muslim countries). So that is the reason they responded to the request.
They are going to start tracking your life and the life of your friends, then the life of your friends' friends, until they track the life of all people on earth.
@SolidTy Add to that; that lots of who play COD now don't know or care about what Activision's doing, and they don't come to gaming sites to check news about gaming, they just buy the game because they like it.
Another problem that, though we all know that this will come to an end, Activision already made huge profits out of it.
Never played a FarCry game, but if the game is good they should release it in the time that suits them best. Look at what happened to MOH in 2010, they rushed the game to release it before COD and it was too bad and the game felt unfinished.
If companies release well made games, they will sell despite being near the release of COD or not and these games will be popular by the time.
I can't totally agree with you. I think there are 2 reason for some weapons to feel overpowered.
First; it's if the weapon is actually messed in the game like AK 47 U that was clearly overpowered and even its stats didn't match its power in the game.
Second; if the game scale is small and the game is almost pure gun-on-gun, then you get to feel that some weapons are so strong.
Take BF3 as example IMO i don't think the weapons are balanced at all, but the large scale makes it hard to feel what weapon is strong or weak, and COD4 you could almost use any weapon you like and you won't feel overmatched by others, and there were weapons that were used by most of the people like MP5 but we can't say it was actually overpowered.
I disagree with, I think BO was better than MW2 and currency system was acceptable and fun somehow.
Maybe the quality of BO wasn't that good, but at least it still somehow playable, compared to MW2 multiplayer which was full of spamming and things that ruined the multiplayer after about 2 months. Though i don't say that BO doesn't have spamming, but it can't be compared to what MW2 has.
Actually that's pointless. I think that the last thing that was good that prestige rest all your progress, that what made the game playable (to an extent) to new people. I think that ruins the prestige idea they started.
If the game is good i might get it for fun with friends but i doubt it will be. I didn't buy MW3, BO wasn't bad and it was fun for some time, and simply if BO2 isn't good i won't buy it.
hellangel_boy's comments