Was aimed at Dorknight, I forgot to remove you so I'm sorry for that.

Hey I know the game has problems (hell after 20 hours I'm putting it on hold until it gets some more content) but yeah I didn't mean you were a lem man.

Love how lems compare a game that took 3 years to become half way decent to a game that has been out for less than 24 hours.

Gotta love these loons.

@NathanDrakeSwag: Microsoft's 1st party games are already 1080p on Xbox One, smart guy.

I thought the problem with SFV is just the lack of single-player modes?

lol where were these arguments when shit tier games not nearly as good in the gameplay area like Fallout and The Witcher 3 came out?

With SFV now it's "bu but you're part of the problem". Da fuk outta here.

SFV is a competitive fighting game and in that area it currently has no equal. PC clowns buy unfinished games all the time and wait for the inevitable patch and fix for them and those games don't even have respectable gamesplay.

Where were these arguments for Star Citizen? Hypocrites? Idiots? Talk about unfinished game? And how much have you lot openly admitted to poring into that "to be continued" time share project? LMAO, no GTFOH!

No, SFV has the elements that matter most in a game and that is fantastic virtually peerless gameplay and it will continue to get content monthly throughout it's lifespan.

In comparison something like Star Citizen hasn't even demonstrated competent gameplay and neckbeards have been throwing money at it like mad and it's nowhere near complete so your argument fails based on gross system wars fanboy hypocrisy. END

Except it's not, that's where your argument turned stupid and you loose all credibility.

Multiplayer is the main draw for both Street Fighter and Halo. SFV at least has the multiplayer working, so it has the edge over MCC's release in that regard.