That's exactly why I don't understand console only player or console fanboys. Why waste $60 on a game withy worse graphics, controls and framerates when you can get the same game with better graphics, more freedom, better controls and depending on your hardware better framerates for only $50 to $30.

I actually have too many games on PC because they're just so damn cheap, most of my games in my Steam account have never been played because I just don't have time to play them all. I just can't resist when a game like Borderlands 2 only cost $50 to begin with and then gets 75% off on top of that.

Crysis 1 custom Map (with standart Crysis 1 models, textures etc) shats all over this and Killzone 4.

We had this kind of graphics 6 years ago on PC. So you wanna tell me that Crytek is nothing special even though it took everyone else 6 years to come up with the same kind of graphics? And BF4 doesn't really look better than Crysis 3, neither does Killzone 4. And the faces from Activison are actually from a nVidia presentation and they're just faces, not huge outdoor levels with millions of polygons.

Well, PS4 already gets games that run at 720p, that's pretty pathetic. I've played games in high resolutions than that 10 years ago...

Then, Xbox 720 aparently won't allow used games? Well I won't waste a dime on that console either then.

Wii U, they barely catched up with 360/PS3 in 2013.. seriously... but the excluvies seem rather interesting.

PC, I haven't upgraded in 6 years and I can still play every game with mid to high graphics at 1600x900 resolution, if I can upgrade my

PC to run next gen games for less than $600 I might consider a few more years of being a PC only player but I'm not sure. I loved PSX and PS2,

sadly PS3 was a big dissapointment, if the PS4 turns out to be better then I guess that's the console I'll be getting.

Oh how I miss the good old days of gaming where we had amazing RPG's like FF VII, FF VIII, FF IX or Star Ocean 2.

And yet my 560Ti will be suffienct t run the game with similar graphics.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d1ZOYU4gpo#t=643s

This is from the nVidia press conference, I don't know what that has to do with Activison.

It's showing of PC graphics and it runs on a Titan.

Not true.

I've built my PC in 2006.

It cost me around 550 bucks.

I can still play every game with better graphics and better framerates than my Xbox 360.

So I'm pretty sure I my current PC will outlast this generations consols and I hope I can build a gaming PC that's

cheaper than the next gerneration and will play games with the same or better graphics/framerate.

[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]The game barely looks any betterMichael0134567

Its an HD remaster, not a full Remake....

Only on PlayStation. Ownage confirmed!

I've been playing FFX with a emulator in 1080p with all the graphics gimmicks you could think of for years, looks even a little bit better than this "HD version" and is free if you have the original PS2 game.

Only on PC. Ownage confirmed!