[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"][QUOTE="Atrus"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]I kinda meant that the laws were not abolished (Not all anyway) but the punishments. I'm not selectively interpreting anything. Justice is one of God's personalitys. He cannot go against His own personality.
And God's not coming to Earth Himself is no proof that He isn't there. Can you imagine what would happen if something happened today like in Evan Almighty?
sSubZerOo
Again you have no evidence for this except for the supposed inaction of God to punish people. If God did that all the time then he wouldn't have written laws telling people to stone other people. It's up to the people to do that, and the people stopped on their own because the laws of God sucked, and the people themselves could no longer entertain a God that jumped into the world after they were exiled by the Babylonians, their nation destroyed.
There is no evidence of God repealing the laws or punishments for them. You are trying to pick something out of the air in order to justify an unfounded position. We could easily say that if God went so far as to explicitly dictate its laws then the lack of an explicit repealing infers that they and their punishments should still stand. Who are you to dictate what God should or should not do when punishing people? Perhaps it's working in that "mysterious way" people suggest. All you know is that there are explicit laws and no motion to repeal them.
You are misinterpreting what I said. God couldn't NOT punish somebody for a crime, because that would be an injustice. These punishments were no longer needed, as Christ was the ultimate compensation. So most of the laws, like th eTen Commandments, still apply, but they are not punished. I am not digging this out of thin air. I am not saying God should or shouldn't do something. Look it up. Try Paul Little.
And btw, That verse with the gu sacrifising his daughter, he made a vow to do so. It was an OLD RULE that if you swear by God or yourself, you must come through woth that vow. So he did.
And you are just picking out of thin air notions that people abandoned God's laws because "They sucked" At least I'm putting up an argument.
I have to go to bed.
The irony of this all is the fact why that guy was not considered a murderer is because women back then were considered property at best.. Or how bout the rediculousness of the 10 commandments?
Bad language made it, but rape and child abuse didn't?
what "guy" and murderare you talking about?
by bad language the ten commandments is taking the lord's name in vain, not cussing or anything like that. also, "do not commit adultery* is one of the ten commandments, so that pretty much covers rape and child abuse.
Log in to comment