@kaminobenimizu: If you read the article, you will notice that noone from EA used the word 'kids', they said 'younger audience'. A 17 year old is a 'younger audience'. Seriously did anyone making remarks about the 'kids' bit read past the heading?

@Rufus_the_rat: Please point out this slip? EA said 'younger audience'; in what sense does that imply people younger than 17?

@xenomorphalien: EA says 'younger consumers' (for an M rated game I think that means 17 year olds in the US?), only Gamespot said kids. It doesn't imply people under that age.

Is such the sorry state of education in the US that one could feasibly suspect that a 17 year old would not know anything about the two world wars?

@nabinator: He appears to have arrived here, 3 weeks late, to write a comment about AMD cards to just about everyone who had posted here.

@Gravity_Slave: Some people definitely need to agree on that fact as much as we do.

@panda0nX: The content in Overwatch is the heroes. And a progression system would defeat the point of the game.

@AssaultMonkey9: I don't see much value in the repetition of large numbers of hours in multiplayer generally, I value story and more crafted experiences; that's just me. But to say that someone who has fun spending 50 or 100 or 1000 hours playing a multiplayer title isn't getting 'value' from $60 is just absurd.

@deviltaz35: You must live somewhere where all the food is awful if you couldn't find a burger worth $14.

@xenomorphalien: Several years worth of watching on YT. Unit Lost has some decent guides that highlight gameplay for particular heroes. That might be a good start.