http://www.gamertagradio.com/new/2011/11/exclusive-to-wal-mart-99-new-blue-wii/

best exclusive of 2011?

A system that plays Witcher 2, Skyrim, Dark Souls, Mass Effect 3, Gears 3, Alan Wake, Fable, Halo etc etc for just 139$, crazy stuff

loosingENDS

lol funny how you gotta name 4 multiplats to make the list bigger

http://www.examiner.com/console-gaming-in-national/black-friday-2011-target-doorbusters-preview-shows-140-xbox-360

just when you thought the PS360 gap was closing, think again

[QUOTE="killu-later"][QUOTE="Heil68"]I would give that to Uncharted 3 and its god tier lighting.. rumbalumba

troll harder. even if the events are scripted, they're still real-time and not a cutscene. in the Gears series, you watch as a tower collapse in a cutscene. in Uncharted, you're in the building, controlling Drake as he escapes the collapsing building. there's a big difference. the biggest moments in Uncharted, Naughty Dog lets you play in those moments. the burning chateau, the sinking cruise ship, the falling airplane, etc.

I would give that to Uncharted 3 and its god tier lighting.. Heil68

It definately looks nice. One thing I found in Uncharted 3's godrays is that you can see them from all angles, and they have hard edges, but gears managed to get soft edges and make them only visible when looking at the sun. Honestly, the softness makes them look proper.

Phazevariance

[QUOTE="Pokemon266"]

wow those gears pics are ugly graphics are terrible play uncharted 3 and you will see the massive difference

uncharted 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. gears 3

uncharted 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> gears 3

uncharted DF >> gears 3

loosingENDS

I only see Gears 3 looking 10x better than the TC pics, for one is not a mess on textures and jaggies like the confusing picture of U3, it looks clean and perfect

The lighting, textures, AA, motion blur, picture clairity, AA etc all look leaps better in Gears 3 pics imo

All there is to see in those Gears 3 pics are jaggies and motion blur to try and cover jaggies. So bad i dont even wanna quote them

[QUOTE="killu-later"]

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

i forgot to mention, UC3 does great graphics without resorting to Motion Blurring....Gears3

Inconsistancy

UC3 dont hide behind cheap vaseline Motion Blur like Geow3killu-later

oh now Motion Blur is good? remember Blurzone 2?

[QUOTE="killu-later"]

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

I said MGS3 had better bosses

MGS4 controled better, played better, and story was presented better(cutscenes were directed at hollywood level compared to 3)

Not to mention MGO(which is part of MGS4)

MGS4 was the better package, but MGS3 did have some better elements(like bosses)

If MGS3 was realeased as the substance version, then yeah you could argue, but it wasn't. MGS3 was realeased in its origional flawed version with bad controls & the lack of a great online experience (MGO was great)

dercoo

what the hell, it's not Substance version? Fail

We judge a game by its release, not its release or mods later. MGS3 was realesed with several big problems

edit: oh, you thought I ment the collection, no substance is the version in the collection. Just comparing which was better in its time

To overal summarize MGS3vs MGS4(what easch did/had better:

MGS3:

+better/more self inclosed story

+better bosses

+better atmosphere(nailed the cold war vibe

MGS4:

+Better directed story(more cinimatic engrossing cut scenes, very hollywood styl e)

+better/more refined gameplay

+better controls

+more diverse campaighn

+more options/features in campaighn(like you could make rebels your allies or enemies, gun system, ect)

+MGO(definitive PSN version)

Overall, MGS4 was the better package & game

had MGS4 all these years and never touched MGO. how is it, now?