Seems Crysis 2 looks vastly better than Crysis 1 afterall, even on xbox 360
killzoneded's forum posts
Glad to see the PS3 finaly surpassing the 360 win quality games as of the spread sheet...
But after 5 years it has a few games more.. is this really that much of a victory?
OhSnapitz
Indeed, because it does not matter what games one likes, just how many games are AAA on the spreadsheet
For example a gamer that hates shooters would still like a lineup with 100 AAA shooters more than anything, even though hates these games
I am not so glad to see the fun in gaming replaced by the ranking in a spreadsheet
Fantastic pics above. I cant believe some ppl dont find them impressive for console standards!
PAL360
They do, they just dont let it be known for obvious reasons
Who would have though xbox 360 could do such graphics ? It was a very unexpected turn really, so took many by surprise
How many times do these theads need to be created and how many times do the creaters need to get badly owned before people stop this nonsense? Both Crysis 2 on consoles and KZ3 look like ass when compared to Crysis "anything" on the PC anyway!
AnxietyAttack
Actually the xbox 360 version of Crysis 2 looks about same as the PC version maxed
For one im worried that my launch 360 could brake down and then my mass effect character which i want to carry on to me3 that iv played with from me1 will die with my xbox. im also a huge mass effect fan and havent played the dlc. none of it on the 360 so i would be getting new unseen content.
has any one done this and then regretted it?rawrB
You cant play Mass Effect 1 on PS3, so that is not an option imo, to play the trilogy must stick to 360
The most impoartant is the name Halo
Since everything counts and Halo delivers fully in fun and freedom in gameplay more than any shooter
[QUOTE="killzoneded"]
[QUOTE="blitzcloud"]
Then Turn10 is okay in that aspect, but not rare. Rare has not gone beyond 84 in metacritic.
blitzcloud
Which is fine, since the best games this generation are the 7.5-9.0 scoring ones and the worst the 9+ ones, for me at least that dont like 5 hour repeatitivegames and only rent them
Normally, games that are in the 90+ on metacritic means players will ultimately enjoy them regardless the genre they like. 80s means normally that you should be inclined to like the genre. 70s, you should like the genre quite a bit or the saga itself. 60s, all of 70, plus there's some faults. 50s, same as before, with too many faults.Actually the 90+ are games only casuals will enjoy, usually are linear and 5-7 hours cinematic titles with basic gameplay
People still on this Crysis 2 stuff really:?....I don't think its reaching photo realism at all...It's looks good don't get me wrong...
Promised_Trini
Well, the above pics look a million times more photorealistic than anything i have seen on any system so far, so is the closest anyway
Easilly btter
Developers only lately take advantage of 360 hardware, that is very complicated to optimize for, that is why Alan Wake, Halo Reach look so amazing and Crysis 2 best looking on consoles
With the coming Codename Kingdoms, Fable 4 with new Rage like engine, Alan Wake 2, Gears 3 and Forza 4 will top anything in the market visually
Got the game for 30$, this is not a topic about the quality of the game, but how much developers put effort in the PC version.
You have sharp as nails textures, PC UI, PC menus, everything setting is adjustable,it actually feels like a PC game.What do you think abou this? Crytek completely snubbed the PC version, while even Homefront ****** tried.
Don't respond in some manner like "Too bad the game sucks".
GeneralShowzer
And yet, the game looks 1000% worst than the Crysis 2 xbox 360 version
Log in to comment