This thread will not end well.Now every one will fight over a single flower or a single rock missing :lol: .

Then some one will jump in and say Gears 2 is far better and then some one will jump in and say that KZ2 is better :lol:

how can i play in HD when i have an Sd tv?

:P

rsoxguy12

lol..you can buy a HD ;)

Just thought would give you guys this vital piece of info.

If you notice that once your running your PS3 with hdmi cables(HDTV or HD monitor)you can go to the display settings and check all the Hd resolutions which include 720p,1080i and 1080p.Dont forget to turn RGB full range(HDMI) to full and turn on super white (HDMI) aswell.Then after that,go to the game settings and select ps upscaling to full screen.

Now coming to the important part :

*Note: When i was new to the PS3,since i am using a full HDCP(progressive only) monitor i checked 720 and 1080p for mine.But than when i went to the video output setting while actually playing some of the FULL HD supported games such as GTA IV,my monitor was only displaying 720p(1280x720).For some reason it wouldnt display 1080p(1920x1080).I went to the display settings and unchecked 720p and this time only checked 1080p.That was the solution.My GTA IV is currently running on 1080p and not only has the resolution improved but things like blooming and reflections have also improved.Also the vaseline bluriness has gone.The flickring of shadows has also dissapeared.

So just wanted to tell you guys that the games which support FULL 1080p HD resolutions will NOT RUN AT 1080p unless and until you uncheck 720p from the display settings.Make sure to do that because theres a massive improvement in visuals and gameplay experience overall.

Enjoy :)

Bring it on, baby!

WhenTheTwoFace

lol your going to make a topic everyday ? This isnt GOW forum.This is SW.

It won't get a 10. It'll probably get a 9. And no, it isn't really innovative, nor are the possibilities endless. Still looks like a lot of fun.pyromaniac223

How exactly do you back that up ?

[QUOTE="lesner87"]

Well no dude your wrong.This is just a usual misconception amongst un-informed people (especially at SW).People over here dont know jack about both tht engines and always go on saying that Cryengine 2 is better.

As i said earlier that Far Cry 2 is more advance.Its has ALL those features of Crysis and alot more added to them example :

Fully destructable enviroments (Not just palms trees and sheds,trees break off properly where you shoot them even from the branches)

False... Gameplay has shown that isn't true. Things like crates being bulletproof and buildings being indestructible have been seen in the gameplay. Not only that but many trees are indestructible

Day night cycles

Every thing (Even every single blade of grass) reacts dynamicly to the world and enviorment (weather,fire,player..etc..etc)example when a car passes over the grass it leaves a trail of dead grass and if the enemy notices that, they will investigate.

Early reviews have stated that the AI is rather lackluster and isn't nearly smart enough to actually react to stuff like that. It is a shoot-kill AI that honestly has no tactics and no awareness beyond shooting at you.

Full open streaming world WITHOUT any invisible walls(or loading times)

There is 1 load time... They split the world into two seperate 25 square km worlds.

Crysis has levels of that size, only the actual playable regions of those levels are much smaller. Performance wise, using the whole level wouldn't make any difference on CryENGINE 2 because of the way it works, however it would increase the demands on Disk Space. And severely limit the ability to provide a sense of progression they were going for in Crysis.

Far more advance AI (They actually have lunch,dinner,sleep...etc....They even try to trap you,they even try to rescue their injured buddies,they even chase you down if you run away) They even follow the tyre tracks or trails.

Read above...

Its better optimized than Cryengine 2

Debatable... Nobody knows how good final performance will be. It also lacks many of the features of Crysis.

These all are some of the features which are added to far cry 2(and can be added to Cryengine 2 but havent been)All the other important features of Cryengine 2 (motion blurr,depth of field,soft-self shadowing,advance dx10 bumpmaping,destructable trees and buildings) are all added in FC2.So that makes FC 2 no less than Cryengine 2.Heres a video proof :

Underlined is not in Far Cry 2. Also, take out things like Ambient Occlusion, Parallax Occlusion Mapping, Procedural Animation Warping, and soft particle physics.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMDH3LPJ7l0&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU7lyFmgeFg&feature=related

As you can notice it has all those things i mentioned including more destructability of buildings.The trees just dont snap off,their branches break properly and dynimacilly depending on where you shoot.

In terms of beauty Crysis gets the upper hand.Thats what i mentioned in my VERY first post.The reason is very simple.The setting of Crysis is more appealing.With green lush jungles and beautiful islands its like a Heaven.I enjoyed Crysis on High-very high and it was visually one of the best games i ever played.In the end its all a matter of your taste.

horrowhip

You are misinformed... Many of the features you said Far Cry 2 "has" have actually been removed from the game for performance reasons.

In terms of raw textures and lighting, Crysis clearly has the upper hand. In terms of demands, Crysis is certainly more demanding by a significant amount.

LOL Proof please ?

Visit UBI soft blogs.They didnt remove them.They build Dunia engine FROM SCRATCH to better support all types of cheap and low hardwares.Unlike Cryengine 2,which is one of the worst un-optimized engine.Though they are working on optimizing it for the dual core and consoles.