[QUOTE="mingo123"]

:| just coz $700 pc can run crysis doesnt mean you wont be upgrading anymore, that hardware will be outdated next year

True_Gamer_

And upgrade to run what again? ANy games more demanding than Crysis? Oh wait there arent....

The world progresses.It wont just stop at Crysis.Two years more and that rig will be outdated.

Its simple really.

Crysis has better Graphics.

Dunia engine has better effects.

Now, by effects i mean, regenerative vegetation, growing vegetation, real time day night cycles, real time real weather systems, cloud formation, fire propagation, weapons jam and malfunction, the health system is better too ie dislocations and shrapnel etc. For a 50 sq km (which is bigger than oblivion so stop making the comparison noobs), to constantly stream this is quite an amazing feat. So while Cryengine may bet prettier, the Dunia engine is far more substantial and powerful in terms of real worldness.

pseudocaesar

FINALLY some one with brains !

Keep dreaming and reading fake hype articles.

I hope you realise that 8800 GTX is at least 3 times more powerfull than card in Play Station 3 / Xbox 360

AND 8800 GTX is OUTDATED

Lidve

This is why i dont argue with fanboys like you ! CAn you please explain to me how programing on consoles work ?

[QUOTE="lesner87"][QUOTE="Lidve"]I wont bother replying to your posts.Judging by what you are writing.Have fun playing Crysis.Lidve

Yes,continue AVOIDING direct comparsion.

You start war than say "i wont bother"

You clearly have no clue what you are talking about

Dude enough with the posting pics on this thread allrite.Anyone can do that.I avoid you because you are person who thinks that Cryengine 2 the most horibly optimized engine in the history is VERY WELL optimized...Yes thats exactly why i dont bother and thats exactly why i told you to go and play Crysis and enjoy that.

OMG its such a head ache replying to you guys.

Most of you just go on giving personal opinion.Please dont bother replying to me without any proper backup/proof(Other wise i will not answer).I have included proper backup and proof in each of posts.And you guys just go on crying like kids.I knew it was a bad idea to talk about this with kiddish hermits(thats what they call em here) like you guys.lol..

"Do you even understand what you are talking about. The CryEngine 2 is pretty much undisputed throughout the industry as being able to achieve the highest graphical fidelity. If you believe that FarCry 2, especially the console version is visually better than Crysis them I'm gonna say you're alone on this one mate lol."

My point wasnt that AT ALL.From the begining i am comparing the optimization/looks/features of DUNIA and CRYENGINE 2.Which in any experienced or smart opinion DUNIA is far better in every aspect.My point is not to compare CONSOLES and PCS.I clearly mentioned in my first post that PCs will be far more superior than consoles.

"I know, this lesner87 is becoming quite amusing...he's not Wok7 is he? or his little brother?"

So you guys make fun of a person who provides his facts and proof over here ? :D

"The CryEngine 2 is a monster.

Nothing can really compare.

If Warhead is any indication it can be a monster, and run on a huge number of gaming computers, with its newly optimised CryEngine 2 (that will come as a patch for Crysis). "

This is your monster engine ?

http://www.ripten.com/2008/04/07/ps3360-cry-engine-2-to-look-near-high-settings-on-pc/

"Did you read my whole post? At the very beginning I say the engine is heavily modified, but never the less it is easier to build upon something than start from scratch (which is what Crytek did with Cryengine 2). Why else do you think they built the engine on Cryengine 1 instead of making a new engine themselves (after all they have to pay Crytek for the use of the engine no matter how heavily modified it is). So yes they do deserve credit for the great work they have done with the engine (and from what I have seen they have done a great deal), but to me Crytek is more deserving of praise when it comes to making engines."

They would do that because its a smarter thing to do.Theres a difference between obssesions and aims :).So my point proved.

[QUOTE="lesner87"]I already gave the video in which almost ALL types of trains/sceneries have been compared.In which if you ask me FC2 looks FAR more realistic.Here watch it again if you missed on it :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNPHZhDhKDU

Have fun.Again my point MATTER OF A FORCED OPINION :).

Lidve

LOL? Crysis looks WAY BETHER + its YOUTUBE video with like 320x240 resolution

I wont bother replying to your posts.Judging by what you are writing.Have fun playing Crysis.