You are not making any sence.

1) You make claims that PS3/360 can do anything that PC can and yet the benchmark you use to point out how poorly Crysis is optimised is one of the game running in DX10, which neither the PS3 or the 360 can do. So which is it?

2) The benchmark of the game is running in a resolution that is much, much higher than anything the PS3/360 can handle (hell it is higher than most PC gamers can handle).

3) Warhead looks better and runs better than Crysis, why are you ignoring this? This would be like me judging the performance of the 360/PS3 only by the quality of its release titles and totaly ignoring all the games that came after it.

4) The people on GT themselves said that they were underwhelmed with the console version of Far Cry 2 because they had been used to seeing it on high settings and resolution on the PC. They said it looked like it was the medium setting on PC.

5) As for price, for $700 EA will sell you a PC that will run Warhead on Very High, now please tell me how in the world that is not a better deal?

Philmon

Wow you are completely taking my point somewhere else.I am not fighting for consoles i am saying that Far Cry 2 is better than PC.Ok let me just go point by point.

1)That is exactly why i said that Crysis is a piece of crap infront of Far Cry 2 because it is NOT at all optimized.

2)Again you are turning it into a PC vs console which i am not looking for

3)HAHAHA hiding behind Warhead so SOON ? I thought you could protect youre beloved Crysis a little bit more :D.

Warhead is a completely different and a very well optimized and TONED down game.DONT EVEN bring it in here.No wonder it can run on a 700$ PC.

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/previews/41251/Crysis-Warhead-Hands-on

Guess that does it for your post.Is there anything else ?

[QUOTE="lesner87"]

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]Crysis graphics are much better then farcry 2 imo.Lidve

Matter of a forced opinion.:D

Forced OPINION? I dont think so,give me ANY Far CRY 2 screenshot and ill give you bether Crysis screenshot + Crysis is game from 2007 + CRYTEK made FAR CRY than sold license to PUBLISHERS (Ubisoft) and now Ubisoft is developing Far Cry 2 and ORIGINAL TEAM (CRYTEK) created NEW MASTERPIECE (CRYSIS)

I already gave the video in which almost ALL types of trains/sceneries have been compared.In which if you ask me FC2 looks FAR more realistic.Here watch it again if you missed on it :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNPHZhDhKDU

Have fun.Again my point MATTER OF A FORCED OPINION :).

Before you go jumping around that its targetted towards DX9.Let me tell you that it has OBVIOUSLY FULL DX10 support but at the same time it keeps in mind of the average gaming machine.So its indeed a FAR more smarter engine than Cryengine 2.This is called using a brain.

As i proved earlier,it has somewhat no relation to Cryengine.What usual hermits would like to believe and bash onto it for their own joy.:)

Dunia is based on Cryengine 1 (altho they say it is heavily modified), and you can say what you want about Crytek but they are good at making cutting edge engines. I find it unfair that people give Ubisoft full credit for the engine in Farcry 2, when it is built upon Cryteks old engine.

I think it is a bit too early to say which engine is better optimised since we have yet to have any independant benchmark of Farcry on high settings (remember when Crytek promised that Crysis would run on very high on the hardware at the time). Also with confirmation coming from other sources that Warhead looks and runs better than Crysis, Farcry is not now going against Crysis but Warhead.

Lets just wait for the release of Farcry 2 to see if it does stack up to Crysis in the various fields.

Philmon

A usual MISCONCEPTION amongst many people i have talked to.Its basically based on the Cryengine 1 ! Allright ok fine.BUT what actually do you mean by that ? I bring myself down and talk in your language.

That does not mean that its completely backing up from that engine.That simply mean that they took their idea from there.The DUNIA engine in tech terms is ONLY and ONLY using 2-3% Cryengine codelines.Rest all engine is build form scratch.Its better optimized,only because its in production since before Crysis.They have OBVIOUSLY upscaled all the features.I cannot explain anymore,read this for your self

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=nl&u=http://tweakers.net/nieuws/50850/ubisoft-licht-tipje-van-de-sluier-over-far-cry-2-op.html&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://tweakers.net/nieuws/50850%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DxUy

Crysis graphics are much better then farcry 2 imo.kozzy1234

Matter of a forced opinion.:D

it's true there are no new features PC has introduced this gen, however the old ones like:

-high-res textures

-high AA

-high AF

are still not avaible in console games

and while FC2 looks great, it doesn't look anywhere near as good as Crysis, even PC FC2 and we know that console FC2 will look a lot worse than PC version .AdrianWerner

Well i was going to say "Finally some one with knowledge" until i read the last part of your post.The console games which come out,if you ever met or talked to a dev you`ill know.They HONESTLY DECREASE HELL LOT of things from PCs.But again they decrease them in a way that they are ENTIRELY un-noticeable.Let me think of an example for you,yea for example compare both the 360 and PS3 version of GTAIV.The Ps3 didnt have ANY antialising where as the 360 version did.Now compare them side by side Ps3 verison seems to have been better antialised :).The reason : Because the DESIGNED THE GRAPHICS THEMSELVE to look antialised.Understand my point ? So similarly these tricky tweaks dont require ANYTHING at all from the hardware but once they are caught in motion they cheat your eye.

haha, joke post? Crysis runs smooth on my pc and the new crysiswarhead PC for 600$ can run the new crysis warhead with everything on high. .kozzy1234

to your this thing,watch this vid :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knKWVG6blIA&feature=related

MAX FPS = 23.29.For a rig that costs nearly twice as much as a PS3 or Xbox 360 :).Is this what you get for your money ? And thats not the fault of the hardware.Its the FAULT OF CRYENGINE 2.IS that enough to prove my point :) ?

*TO ALL WHO ARE SAYING THAT CONSOLE FAR CRY 2 IS GONNA SU** INFRONT OF PC FAR CRY 2 PLEASE WATCH THIS :

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/39190.html

This is a console footage.If you ask me for 200$ you get a Xbox 360.And for 200$ more you get a PS3 with a built in BLU RAY.THATS HELL LOT OF A GOOD DEAL.

Correct me if I'm wrong but isnt Far Cry using a dumbed down engine because it was made with consoles in mind?

Crysis is PC only.

killerfist

HAhaha who gave you that idea ? Dunia engine is even better than Cryengine 2.Dunia is made by UBISOFT and is in production EVEN before Crysis came out.

Its not crap but they have VERY WELL optimized the engine.Thats ANOTHER advantage over the Cryengine 2.The Cryengine 2 undoubtably was the most horrible engine EVER made in terms of optimization (Four way SLI 9800GTX could only pull around 55+ average on Cryengine 2)Imagine that sh** !

I see alot of people claiming over here that Crysis is the best thing since sliced bread,usually hermits and i personally think that they have a very biased view most probably due to the fact that Far Cry 2 is going to both consoles.If we all have un biased views,which people at GS will never have.We can see that games like Crysis can be ported to console.Ofcourse i do agree that PCs will always be FAR more superior.But UPTIL now there hasnt been any new feature invented on PCs to make games look much cooler(example soft-shadowing).All the features of PCs (currently) can be ported to the consoles.The latest cards which have come only have RAW power not any new feature.Correct me if i am wrong.

Heres a small comparison video :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNPHZhDhKDU

Heres another video showing of Warhound(X360),Dead Island(X360),Crysis,Farcry 2.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIvbDbpujRo

So now tell me which one do you think looks better ?

Farcry 2 is not the same on all platforms graphically...its been confirmed that the console versions are running the game at medium settings.cobrax75

Proof please ? What i heard from some interview was that the PS3 version has only a decreased resolution THATS ALL ABOUT IT !

Well it is highly possible.Seeing what happened to the last xbox i would say that this xbox wont last much longer.Ever since the PS3 has come out,its beating its sales continuosly,and already taken over in europe.

Earlier another article came talking about the fact that the 360s power have been peaked out on Gears of War 2.Pretty shamefull though.They made a "Next-Gen" console which coudlnt even last 5 years.Thank God i got rid of mine long ago.

Hey should i spend 300 bucks on a 360, or should i get a 150 dollar video card, a 120 on a processor and 30 on ram, to upgrade my pc?Jacobistheman

I would recommend upgrading the PC but it all depends on which video card you are getting.If its 8 series than dont bother.We are talking 9+ series here.Something like 9800GTX would be great with a core 2 duo and 2 gig crossair ram.This should run all the games perfectly fine !