m3Boarder32's forum posts

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@UssjTrunks said:
@Pedro said:
@UssjTrunks said:

There is no way to know what purpose a GPU was bought for.

And AMD sold better than Nvidia because AMD cards are the gold standard for mining. Mining is the only reason their sales aren't in the gutter because AMD GPUs cannot compare to Nvidia for gaming. I'm not saying that as an Nvidia fanboy either (I'd much rather have an AMD GPU to use with my freesync display), AMD cards are just a full generation behind Nvidia.

AMD CPUs on the other hand are fantastic and completely blow away Intel in price-to-performance ratio.

LOL at AMD cards cannot compare to Nvidia but you are not a fanboy. LMAO. People on this forum are precious.

They launched Vega 56 and 64 at the end of 2017 to compete with Nvidia's GTX 1070 and 1080 (and they still fall short). Until then, their strongest card was the 580, which is equivalent to a 1060. They're a full generation behind Nvidia.

Ayone who is a fanboy of a specific hardware manufacturer (like you since Xbox uses AMD) is an idiot. You always go for the best cost-to-performnce ratio, and AMD GPUs are awful value right now.

I don’t know about a ”full generation behind”

A R9 290 X at 1440p or 4k in newest games does well vs a 780 Ti.

And a R9 Fury X does well vs a 980 Ti.

Yeah benchmarks show that 1080 Ti is king in today’s games, but I wouldn’t be shocked if a Vega 64 made a comeback in future games and matches or surpassed 1080 Ti performance with the more texture heavy games

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@tryit said:
@ocinom said:

Goodluck building a half decent PC with the gpu inflation

its only about $200 over average, still workable.

my budget is $1500 every (3 years not including monitor) just for the PC itself

Nobody believes you :)

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@commander said:
@Dark_sageX said:
@commander said:

if you want to beat the xboxone you'll need a 1070, and that's not even going to be a big difference,

My god the console peasantry cancer is spreading...

Dude, what you said was false in every conceivable way, you and the other clueless users should really REALLY stop saying an X one X is equivalent to a GTX 1070, at this point its become a stupid anti-PC meme and its up there with "you can't plug a PC to a TV" or "You need to spend $2000 every month just to keep your PC up to date", you have absolutely NO credible source to prove your claim and you have been dubnked thousands of times already, the closest an Xbox ONE X can come to a GPU is an RX 580, and thats without considering the horrible CPU holding it back.

I don't understand this, you quoted me and still misread what I said.

People just want to argue.

You say a 1070 is more powerful and right away they interpret that as saying X1X is as powerful as a 1070.

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@commander said:

You're not going to get more performance with the g4560 and an rx 580 or a gtx 1060 for the same game on the xboxone x, when this games was initially designed for the xboxone x. Now you're comparing games that are ported from the xboxone , initially designed for the xboxone.

Sure you're right real world performance is what matters but potential power is also a thing, the xboxone x is still in its infancy. A console isn't like a gpu or cpu you're buying, the devs need time to get accustomed to it, and this is especially the case with the xboxone x because it doesn't have any games that are built from the ground up for it. It could very well be that red dead redemption is one of the first games to make proper use of its power, maybe some earlier games too, time will tell.

A G4560+GTX 1060 will outperform the X1X at 1080p the vast majority of the time. Makes the 500$ seem way less attractive especially given the fact most people still game on 1080p displays. If you're gonna compare the 500$ console to a 500$ PC(which is stupid), don't be dishonest about it.

There will never be a game made from the ground up for the Xbox One X. Its destiny is tied to that of the regular Xbox One. The Xbox One X will always get ports from the regular one. They'll use its superior GPU for better graphics and its CPU thanks to its higher clock speed will yield higher and more consistent frame rates. Unless there is a dramatic shift in the way developers code their game, the X1X CPU will not catch the G4560 this generation, which makes this discussion pointless.

And at 4K X1X will outperform the G4560 + 1060

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@m3Boarder32: Why the **** do you talk about price when you spent 10K on a Atmos set and 2K on a TV?

10k includes the TV my friend

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@appariti0n said:

Oh look, price/value advice from the guy who brags about spending $1800 on a TV stand, and puts a $500 piece of crap in it.

Probably has a rusted out civic with a stereo worth 5x more than the car.

Lol I have a 2012 Tundra, and a 2018 Jeep Wranger. Both with stock sound systems. I’m not big on car audio

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@UssjTrunks said:
@m3Boarder32 said:
@Pedro said:

60fps only matters when you can reach it. When you can't, you simply praise Pcs for the ability to run at a smoother lower frame rate and graphical fidelity.

They‘re even willing to play at 1080p To prove a point lol sad

You can play at 4K 60 fps if you want, but more frames are always superior to higher resolutions. There is a reason why e-sports are played at 144 - 240 fps.

1080/1080Ti can hit 90-100+ fps at both 1080p and 1440p.

For PC gaming a 1080p display is atrocious, pixel density is horrible at a 2 ft viewing distance

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@Pedro said:

60fps only matters when you can reach it. When you can't, you simply praise Pcs for the ability to run at a smoother lower frame rate and graphical fidelity.

They‘re even willing to play at 1080p To prove a point lol sad

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

Why would I care? I don’t game on poor HDR Support PeeC

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@xantufrog said:

@m3Boarder32: don't forget Atmos

Lol true. But this threads just about 4K visuals and 4K performance