well they make chargers for the ps3. I have one and it charges 4 things at once. I have my 3 controllers and my blutooth, so i never have to worry about anything dying. But for people who dont have one why dont u just charge one while u use the other, then u wont have to worry about it.

As usual my PC makes it crash. Should've known better. And now it's too late to give the code away. Anyway, I've pretty much singlehandedly heard bad stuff about it. Supposedly all you do is go from one location to another and hold down F to fill up a bar. Also the controls are bad.InsaneBasura

singlehandedly? Is thier another way to hear things? You sure your buddy didnt hear it for u????:roll:

i have the same problem tc. I was tryin to get back into it, i even bought the dlc but i cant ever play. I goto the mathmaking screen and cant ever get into a game. Sometimes it kicks me out to the multiplayer screen but most of the time it just searches and never finds a game. I really want to enjoy it but what can i do???

[QUOTE="mackey25"]

[QUOTE="Tripleseed"]

All I want from Sony is more original IP's, not more sequels to mediocre shooters that never should have gotten sequels in the first place. It seems like everyone has sequelitis these days, even Sony who was previously renown for taking risks with their games. Now it's Uncharted 2 this, Killzone 3 that, and then there's Infamous 2, Little Big Planet 2, and so on and so forth. What's next, Haze 2? :o

Tripleseed

you complain about not having original games and that they are all sequels yet infamous is a new i.p that just happens to be getting a new game. lbp was a risk when it came out. not to mention the sequel is changing so much that it could be called a new ip. Do u just want them to keep making new franchise after new franchise without making sequels? Same goes for uncharted 2. These are all new ips from this gen.

Then again, some games don't deserve to have sequels at all. Like the original Killzone, for example. Have you ever played it? I played it for a good while, simply because it was the only real multiplayer game I could play with my buddy and some bots. It was a terrible, terrible game.

im sure sony had a reason for making a sequel to it. Not to mention it looks like it turned out pretty well from the overal reception and scores that kz2 got. I never played the first one but im sure glad they made a sequel because its my fav fps and multiplayer game this gen, as im sure it is to millions of other people.

uh.......what???

[QUOTE="mackey25"]

[QUOTE="designer-"]I guess on a rather selfish level I would prefer they did not bother with the 3D effects. Odds are I will not be picking up a new 3D TV within at least another 2 or so years, meaning that I will personally miss out on the positives of it. If they spent the time they would creating the 3D effect on perfecting the "2D" version then maybe the game (for me personally) would have been better. Easyle

how did you get to play it so early? i just found out about the game a few days ago.

"if they spent the time they would creating the 3d effect on perfecting the 2d version the maybe the game WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER"

All I want from Sony is more original IP's, not more sequels to mediocre shooters that never should have gotten sequels in the first place. It seems like everyone has sequelitis these days, even Sony who was previously renown for taking risks with their games. Now it's Uncharted 2 this, Killzone 3 that, and then there's Infamous 2, Little Big Planet 2, and so on and so forth. What's next, Haze 2? :o

Tripleseed

you complain about not having original games and that they are all sequels yet infamous is a new i.p that just happens to be getting a new game. lbp was a risk when it came out. not to mention the sequel is changing so much that it could be called a new ip. Do u just want them to keep making new franchise after new franchise without making sequels? Same goes for uncharted 2. These are all new ips from this gen.

i know people will disagree with me here but personally i think they go for quicker paced aiming like COD. the slower aiming isn't necessarily a bad thing its just that it doesn't go with the gameplay their setting up. In KZ2 the action is very fast paced, frantic, and in all directions. Therefore it's aiming system to play to those strengths but it doesn't, with it's current setup turning around takes a full second which is way too long and even aiming above or belove you takes some time. If you look at BFBC2 is has a similar aiming system as KZ2 but no where near the problem the reason why? BFBC2 multiplaer is a lot slower and deliberate and specifically most of the action happens in front of you not much of it happen above, below, or behind you. If they want to keep KZ2's aiming then they must change the map design and gameplay to suit it the way it set up is to have frantic, quick paced shootouts with slower aiming and very dimensional maps which does not mix.

One thing that doesn't make sense to me is when people say that it's aiming made KZ2 different and hardcore. I'm sorry but KZ2 can't stand on it's own without a frustrating aiming system? KZ2 has a consistently changing game mode(warzone) which besides resistance 2 is not in another game, it has a great kick back system which means you can't spray and pray like in COD, it has a great perks/badges system that creates a great amount of customization and tactics which is unlike anything seen in games. in my opinion it these things that truly separate KZ2 from the pack not it's frustrating and off putting aiming system.

Ragashahs

i agree with alot of what you said. killzone 2 is my most played game and fav. fps. I am used to the controls but could care less if they change them or keep them the same. I love the multiplayer for the frantic action, environments, atmosphere, and overal gameplay. Even if they make the controls exactly like cod it still wont feel or play anything like it. I dont see what the fuss is about

I guess on a rather selfish level I would prefer they did not bother with the 3D effects. Odds are I will not be picking up a new 3D TV within at least another 2 or so years, meaning that I will personally miss out on the positives of it. If they spent the time they would creating the 3D effect on perfecting the "2D" version then maybe the game (for me personally) would have been better. designer-

how did you get to play it so early? i just found out about the game a few days ago.

i feel you. i just looked at the map and was like what the hell? its next to a rock by a cactus in a desert, that shouldnt be to hard to find:roll: