Xbox 360 = paid multiplayer. PS3 = Free multiplayer
markko84's forum posts
[QUOTE="markko84"]
[QUOTE="sts106mat"] yeah we have all been waiting for 12 years for the green lantern game. DNF was an industry joke, now its just sad. how they thought that it was a good idea to release it like that is beyond me. absolutely appalling, easily the biggest let-down ever. that level on the las vegas tower, wtf....sts106mat
Dule Burger? Shrunk duke jumping on the kitchen? I hated that.
I asked myself, "why am i bothering to play this" during the RC vehicle bit, the alien hive thing started out bad, went ok and then ended bad. the final straw was that stupid tower thing with the tree around it, that is just bad, unimaginative level design and will forever be in the game developers encyclopedia under "how not to do levels in FPS games" i used to think jumping in FPS games was bad, Halo somewhat altered my opinion. DNF didn't change my opinion, i just ejected the disc and got rid.
case in point my local gamestation has about 6 or 7 DNF Limited editions behind the counter, i am talking about the one with the "bust" of Duke, it was priced at £79.99. nobody bought them, they are still there today, priced at £39.99, still not moved any. the game is bad bad bad.
Imagine yourselves working on a game developer
suddenly, the creative deisgner comes to you and says : "Lets put our carachter shrunk out by a alien green thing, then he goes out on a toy RC Car around a cassino jumpig on posters and climbin on card tables and killing ratts on the way," ITs obvious that's gonna suck!
[QUOTE="redskins26rocs"][QUOTE="Xtasy26"]you thimk that is bad look at the green lantern movie game and every other game above a 3.5 yeah we have all been waiting for 12 years for the green lantern game. DNF was an industry joke, now its just sad. how they thought that it was a good idea to release it like that is beyond me. absolutely appalling, easily the biggest let-down ever. that level on the las vegas tower, wtf....http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B1
It beat out Duke Nukem Forever. Goes to show GS score of Duke Nukem Forever was truly a JOKE!
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows BETTER than Duke Nukem Forever? Give me a break! :roll:
sts106mat
Dule Burger? Shrunk duke jumping on the kitchen? I hated that.
Hmm maybe he was playing GTA4 with icenhancer and greater textures?
Ienhancer 2.0 (2.5 looks even bether)
Dino_20
Looks awesome, but the game already is bad optimized and runs like crap already even on decent rigs, imagine with all these enhacements.
Yes I use red dot on the VSS, you can run n gun with it, LMAO. [QUOTE="markko84"]The AEK is awful at long range and I hate the scope on it. It's best to have magnum ammo on that gun. Don't mind the others though I do like the M16A2.m16, AEK, AUG, M416, XM8 and F2000 - I love all them.
mitu123
Grab the AEK, go raw with it. It can be fatal at long ranges, in very short bursts. Its a pretty much underrated gun
But if you do not use magnum all the time, those guns aren't the best choices.
EDIT: The AEK is excelent as well on hip fire
[QUOTE="markko84"]Honestly I disagree in one regard, it's a bad shooter, there's so much clutter in the game and an array of minigames to distract from the fact that the game can't hold up on its own shooter stilts; which is why it actually feels like something refreshing in the game. If it was the shame shooting for the games entirety its problems would be even more glaring. But otherwise indeed you're spot on, the game is a perfect example of a patchwork long term design, that was completely unfocused and developed within its own little bubble. It has its merits but yeah, I'd personally point at it as a grand example of everything that can go wrong in a shooter that already had solid bedrock foundations to leap from.But most people treated the game as poor shooter. DUke wasn't enough to save the game, even from duke fans itself. Of course there's fanboys, but every franchise has them.
And don't think its DNF a bad SHOOTER on the literally sense, but its bad on everything else. And I agree about the identity. The game don't have any. The developers tried to implement everything that happened on fps scene on the last 15 years on mix bag of confusion, bad design and overall lack of polish.
skrat_01
I liked the gun fights in the game overall. The 1911 is fun to use, the shotgun has a lot of punch and the ripper is very fun. My fun on DNF drained eveyrtime duke got shrinked or I have to be on a turret.
The RPG looks AWFUL designed, the Devastator is weird looking (feels like a halo wepon), the rail gun is stupid and the Icethrower/shrinker are not fun like they were in Duke 3D.
EDIT: And I couldn''t agree more with your last words. DNF didn't reminded D3D at all. D3D was a fun journey and never got you bored.
And I must point, the DNF is horribly linear.
Anybody here tried to play with the VSS equiped with red dot? Or the TYPE-88/SVU snipers with 4x Scope?
believe, its awesome and very good to protect mcomms. I just can't play with rifles like SVU98, GOL, M24 ou m95 because i'm not the kind of mountain hidden player.
[QUOTE="markko84"]
[QUOTE="mitu123"] It's overpowered, that's why you like it.mitu123
both AN94 and M60 have been nerfed since last year.
AN94 is still powerful, if the fire rate or damage was decreased a bit then maybe it wouldn't be that bad since the accuary is still insane on that gun. I've notice the M60 was nerfed way more.I don't like neither of them. I'm 90% an a assault player, I like all assault rifles except just the AN94, because its ironsights are pretty much garbage and I can't play without LW pack. When I go play medics I usually go with M249 saw, MG3 and PKM.
It's overpowered, that's why you like it.[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="Phoenix534"]
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSS! I love the AN-94!
Wasdie
If the AN-94 is OP then what is the XM8 with magnum ammo? The amount of stuff I can kill with that weapon at any range is amazing.
What, XM8 is Overpowered now??? you gotta be kidding calhoun...
Log in to comment