The ChudChud arguments are agreeable because some consoles games are being sort of looked take for instance mario sunshine , super smash bros, and Paper mario 2 which are extrordinary games but because of over hyping people including me bought some not so good games just cause they came out for sony's playstation 2 games such as Breath Of fire 5, phantom Brave, and Sonic Heroes. The Hardware is not what makes the console just because the Xbox has better Frame rates and a Hard Drive dosen't mean it should have demolished the ps2 as well as the ps2 being supreme for all its games but quantity dosent mean quality in which nintendo has thaught it over because they seem to stay away from popular ideals of the perfect media center and more based upon Replay value of games and their impact on the person because the second i stoped playing super smash bros meele i was still playing the game years after also i even find myself playing my NES from time to time also.
yeah but you must take into account that almost every super expensive system lead to bad sales and the transformation from hardware to software based companies like SNK and 3DO. The neo geo was like $1000 or more i think the games cost atleast 600 each but since only the richest people bought the system and about 10% of people in the world are rich it was seen as a blunder rather then a great console because it had all the best technology like the PS3 but it Lacked in costability cause i would have bought the neo geo home console in a second if it were only $150 or $ 300 and if games didn't get priced like $600 each and this is 1 of the many consoles that got destroyed by other weaker consoles. this can be alsoo contrasted to the sega nomad which was atleast 1 million times better then the gameboy but because of battery life and cost it quickly had a case of the tetris attack virus.
megamatics' comments