monkeysmoke's forum posts

Avatar image for monkeysmoke
monkeysmoke

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 monkeysmoke
Member since 2010 • 457 Posts
ATI built the graphic chip for the GAME CUBEs GPU so does anyone think they were successful or not with the console. Personaly i think the GAME CUBE has more power then the PS2 but it was not well utilized & was also affected by the lack of DVD storage media.
Avatar image for monkeysmoke
monkeysmoke

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 monkeysmoke
Member since 2010 • 457 Posts
If it comes down to ATI DX11 GPU vs NVIDIA DX11 GPU ............ you have to go with NVIDIA. Nonstop-Madness
WHY??
Avatar image for monkeysmoke
monkeysmoke

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 monkeysmoke
Member since 2010 • 457 Posts
But between NVIDIA & ATI which is more powerful for rendering highest graphics setting for games like CRYSIS & METRO 2033 without much drop in framerate.
Avatar image for monkeysmoke
monkeysmoke

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 monkeysmoke
Member since 2010 • 457 Posts

Am no PC or Tech freak so i don't know much about game Hardwares.
From little i know:
NVIDIA GPU served the original XBOX well but it was not well utilized & was unsuccessfully compared to the PS2.
ATI GPU was introduced to the XBOX 360 because of the unsuccessful NVIDIA(not realy sure why).ATI has done a realy nice job for the XBOX 360 providing the console with the most unique GPU features out of all the current consoles. Since Microsoft didn't own full right to the NVIDIA gpu so a hardware EMULATOR for the original XBOX was not implemented on the XBOX 360 instead a software EMULATOR was implemented by the help of the ATI gpu.

ATI seems to have benefited the XBOX 360 very well but currently both
NVIDIA & ATI seems to released various powerful GPU series for the PC & there are still future GPUs series in development within the 2 companies.

So between NVIDIA & ATI which and why do you think microsoft will go for.
YOUR REASON.

Avatar image for monkeysmoke
monkeysmoke

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 monkeysmoke
Member since 2010 • 457 Posts
[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="khoofia_pika"]

PLEASE HIT THIS LINK BEFORE READING THIS ARTICLE

GAMES:The PS3 has the better exclusive library, I agree. But that doesn't mean the 360's exclusive library sucks. It has great exclusives too. It has Gears of War 2, Halo 3, Halo 3: ODST, Halo Wars, Forza Motorsport 2, Forza Motorsport 3 and a ton of other exclusives that are widely regarded as brilliant games. Not only that, it is a known fact multiplats are always better on the 360 than the PS3. Except for maybe Final Fantasy XII and Dragon Age: Origins, all multiplatform titles are obviously better on the X360.

UPCOMING LINEUP: While the PS3 relies on exclusives to make its upcoming lineup strong, the Xbox 360 too will be getting a ton of good releases, contrary to what cows here think. Apart from multiplats like Crysis 2, Medal of Honor, Call of Duty: Black Ops and the like, it will also be getting exclusives like Forza 4, Halo: Reach, Gears of War 3, Mass Effect 3 and Fable III.

BETTER ONLINE COMMUNITY: Let's face it, people. Xbox LIVE >>>>> PSN. Many of you will say Xbox LIVE is not the better community because you have to pay for it, but it's worth it. The interface is smoother and more user-friendly, the support of third parties and and first party is very strong, XBLA exclusive games are spectacular, and games like Halo 3 simply cannot be played online on the PS3. The overall community of XBL is much better than PSN- one can never have as much fun playing on PSN as one would while using Xbox LIVE. Not only that, LIVE has great integration, and much, much, much better features than PSN.

ACHIEVEMNTS > TROHPIES:Trophies are half-baked afterthoughts. All PS3 games don't even have Trophies, while each and every Xbox 360 game ever released, and all that ever will be, HAVE to incorporate Achievements, and all of them do it quite brilliantly. Trophies are just not as interesting and fun as Achievements are. Achievements make us all wanna do stuff in game we wouldn't normally do. Trophies have never made me want to do anything like that.

BETTER THIRD PARTY SUPPORT: Developers like BioWare prefer developing their games on the 360 rather than the PS3, given the fact that the Xbox 360 is nothing but a PC, and PCs are very easy to develope games on. Not only that, as I mentioned above, multiplatform games are always better on the 360. Games like Fallout 3, Elder Scrolls IV, Bayonetta and a hell lot of other third party titles have recieved higher scores on GS AND Metacritic, and it is a generally accepted fact that... you know, multiplats are better on the 360.

Also, developers always develop their games on the 360, and then port them over to the PS3, for multiplatform releases. Which means, games are originally developed for the 360, not the PS3- just like multiplatform releases were originally developed on the PS2 last gen.

BETTER CONTROLLER: We all know it, this is the age of shooters, and the Xbox 360's controller is perfect for shooters. While playing FPS' on the 360, I don't fell the disconnect I usually do while playing shooters on the PS3. The 360 controller has better button mapping, and... it looks better (superficial, I know, but true). The PS3 controller is outdated. Dualshock 3 is same as Dualshock 3, which was the same as Dualshock. So what I am basically implying is that we have been using the same controller for three different platforms ever since the release of PSOne. That is just plain lazy on Sony's part. They need to think of something new. The Dualshock design is outdated, it has started showing it's age.

The 360 controller is also not as cramped as Dualshock 3 feels.

AtariKidX
GEAT!!! but You forgot to ADD: XBLA GAMEs (SHADOW COMPLEX, PERFECT DARK, LIMBO) pawns all PSN games. All XBOX 360 supports BACKWARD COMPABILITY for the original XBOX games while PS3 doesn't support PS2 games any more. XBOX 360 has better interface(NXE) with featuses like AVATAR & CUSTOM SOUNDTRACK support for every games why PS3 doesn't support ANY. XBOX 360 has in built 1080p HARDWARE UPSCALER for games that couldn't meet up with 1080p native. While the PS3 depends on TV UPSCALERs which are not so good all the time. PS3 mostly has problems with firmware updates & HDD problems unlike the XBOX 360.

........and don't forget that almost all of multiplats games look or run better on 360.......AC2,Bayonetta,RE5,Red Dead Redemption.

Do you mean LIST OF CRAPY GAMES ON PS3: #.1 Bioshock #.2 Lost planet #.3 F.E.A.R #.4 Assasins creed 1&2 #.5 COD4:MW 1&2 #.6 Gta4 #.7 Ghost bursters #.8 Fallout 3 #.9 Resident Evil 5 #.9 Bayonneta #.10 Read dead redemption #.11( am tired of listing because i can't list the 99% of multiplat that looks or plays worse on the ps3) Hahahaha the PS3 does not worth any amount of $$$ for me!!!
Avatar image for monkeysmoke
monkeysmoke

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 monkeysmoke
Member since 2010 • 457 Posts
[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="lightleggy"] crysis is not even close to look like real life...it has the best graphics in the world so far...but its looks NOTHING like real life

If CRYSIS does not look real life to you then i wonder what else will.

im sorry, but real life doesnt have extremely vivid colors such as the ones in videogames... a jungle in real life does not look nothing like the one in crysis

Are you sure you know the difference between UNCHARTED 2 & CRYSIS? UNCHARTED 2 is the one with vivid colours that looks noting close to real at all while CRYSIS look extreemly photo realistic. Have you realy been to a JUNGLE before???
Avatar image for monkeysmoke
monkeysmoke

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 monkeysmoke
Member since 2010 • 457 Posts

PLEASE HIT THIS LINK BEFORE READING THIS ARTICLE

GAMES:The PS3 has the better exclusive library, I agree. But that doesn't mean the 360's exclusive library sucks. It has great exclusives too. It has Gears of War 2, Halo 3, Halo 3: ODST, Halo Wars, Forza Motorsport 2, Forza Motorsport 3 and a ton of other exclusives that are widely regarded as brilliant games. Not only that, it is a known fact multiplats are always better on the 360 than the PS3. Except for maybe Final Fantasy XII and Dragon Age: Origins, all multiplatform titles are obviously better on the X360.

UPCOMING LINEUP: While the PS3 relies on exclusives to make its upcoming lineup strong, the Xbox 360 too will be getting a ton of good releases, contrary to what cows here think. Apart from multiplats like Crysis 2, Medal of Honor, Call of Duty: Black Ops and the like, it will also be getting exclusives like Forza 4, Halo: Reach, Gears of War 3, Mass Effect 3 and Fable III.

BETTER ONLINE COMMUNITY: Let's face it, people. Xbox LIVE >>>>> PSN. Many of you will say Xbox LIVE is not the better community because you have to pay for it, but it's worth it. The interface is smoother and more user-friendly, the support of third parties and and first party is very strong, XBLA exclusive games are spectacular, and games like Halo 3 simply cannot be played online on the PS3. The overall community of XBL is much better than PSN- one can never have as much fun playing on PSN as one would while using Xbox LIVE. Not only that, LIVE has great integration, and much, much, much better features than PSN.

ACHIEVEMNTS > TROHPIES:Trophies are half-baked afterthoughts. All PS3 games don't even have Trophies, while each and every Xbox 360 game ever released, and all that ever will be, HAVE to incorporate Achievements, and all of them do it quite brilliantly. Trophies are just not as interesting and fun as Achievements are. Achievements make us all wanna do stuff in game we wouldn't normally do. Trophies have never made me want to do anything like that.

BETTER THIRD PARTY SUPPORT: Developers like BioWare prefer developing their games on the 360 rather than the PS3, given the fact that the Xbox 360 is nothing but a PC, and PCs are very easy to develope games on. Not only that, as I mentioned above, multiplatform games are always better on the 360. Games like Fallout 3, Elder Scrolls IV, Bayonetta and a hell lot of other third party titles have recieved higher scores on GS AND Metacritic, and it is a generally accepted fact that... you know, multiplats are better on the 360.

Also, developers always develop their games on the 360, and then port them over to the PS3, for multiplatform releases. Which means, games are originally developed for the 360, not the PS3- just like multiplatform releases were originally developed on the PS2 last gen.

BETTER CONTROLLER: We all know it, this is the age of shooters, and the Xbox 360's controller is perfect for shooters. While playing FPS' on the 360, I don't fell the disconnect I usually do while playing shooters on the PS3. The 360 controller has better button mapping, and... it looks better (superficial, I know, but true). The PS3 controller is outdated. Dualshock 3 is same as Dualshock 3, which was the same as Dualshock. So what I am basically implying is that we have been using the same controller for three different platforms ever since the release of PSOne. That is just plain lazy on Sony's part. They need to think of something new. The Dualshock design is outdated, it has started showing it's age.

The 360 controller is also not as cramped as Dualshock 3 feels.

khoofia_pika
GEAT!!! but You forgot to ADD: XBLA GAMEs (SHADOW COMPLEX, PERFECT DARK, LIMBO) pawns all PSN games. All XBOX 360 supports BACKWARD COMPABILITY for the original XBOX games while PS3 doesn't support PS2 games any more. XBOX 360 has better interface(NXE) with featuses like AVATAR & CUSTOM SOUNDTRACK support for every games why PS3 doesn't support ANY. XBOX 360 has in built 1080p HARDWARE UPSCALER for games that couldn't meet up with 1080p native. While the PS3 depends on TV UPSCALERs which are not so good all the time. PS3 mostly has problems with firmware updates & HDD problems unlike the XBOX 360.
Avatar image for monkeysmoke
monkeysmoke

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 monkeysmoke
Member since 2010 • 457 Posts
[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="Brainkiller05"]Crysis is basically real lifelightleggy
I second to that. I don't think CRYSIS 2 on pc will surpass CRYSIS on pc intead remain thesame & only stabilize the framerate in high end settings. Honestly CRYSIS is the brink nothing significantly better can surpass it.

crysis is not even close to look like real life...it has the best graphics in the world so far...but its looks NOTHING like real life

If CRYSIS does not look real life to you then i wonder what else will.
Avatar image for monkeysmoke
monkeysmoke

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 monkeysmoke
Member since 2010 • 457 Posts
Crysis is basically real lifeBrainkiller05
I second to that. I don't think CRYSIS 2 on pc will surpass CRYSIS on pc intead remain thesame & only stabilize the framerate in high end settings. Honestly CRYSIS is the brink nothing significantly better can surpass it.