NattyDaddy604's forum posts

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
NattyDaddy604

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#1  Edited By NattyDaddy604
Member since 2019 • 304 Posts

@drlostrib said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

Cannot provide a logical counter argument, resorts to useless comment.

Well, at least you're self aware of your own posting style

Hilarious comeback. I almost forgot to crack a smile. Try providing substance to a conversation, rather than a low IQ comment.

don't really care about your opinion on the matter

Yet you are trying to get somebody censored with a different opinion. Well done keyboard warrior. Stick to the internet, real life is too much for you.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
NattyDaddy604

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#2  Edited By NattyDaddy604
Member since 2019 • 304 Posts

@drlostrib said:

So for example, what about calling for people to be hanged or shot for having (or performing) a legal medical procedure? where would that fall?

Never called for a particular person to be shot or hung. Simply stated an opinion on what should be done to mothers who murder there unborn children. Nice try little snowflake. You done losing?

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
NattyDaddy604

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#3 NattyDaddy604
Member since 2019 • 304 Posts

@drlostrib: Cannot provide a logical counter argument, resorts to useless comment. Come again next time.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
NattyDaddy604

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#4 NattyDaddy604
Member since 2019 • 304 Posts

I mean he's not completely wrong. Should the current generation of Germans be at fault for what Nazi Germany did? Should the current generation of European Americans be at fault for slavery? Should Turkey be at fault for the genocide of Europeans/Asians?

The party never referred to themselves as NAZI's, it was a name given to them. They had both left and right wing leaning policies. They were ethno-nationalists (right wing) with socialist (left wing) policies.

You do realize a person can have right and left wing views right? It is not exclusive to one side?

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
NattyDaddy604

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#5 NattyDaddy604
Member since 2019 • 304 Posts

@Gaming-Planet said:

Paris is no longer Paris.

Rural people are mad af and riot every weekend like it's some weekend leisure.

The culture is divided and people hate each other.

Might as well have it be conquered by some group that does it better.

I'd much prefer it to see it become Islambol.

Give this a guy a medal.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
NattyDaddy604

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#6  Edited By NattyDaddy604
Member since 2019 • 304 Posts
@horgen said:
@nattydaddy604 said:

@horgen: Are you still replying without posting any substance refuting my claims?

My "enlightenment" claim was regarding how one can view parasites and what counts as successful. If a parasite kills it host in 24 hours from entering the host, it has 24 hours to infect another host. If parasite B uses 15 years, it has 15 years to infect others. In terms of surviving, parasite B will do much better.

Regarding similarity between parasites and fetus is from who they get their nutrition to survive and grow. The abundance of other differences do not take away this similarity.

Sorry dude, one of the main classifications of a parasite is one that is from outside of the host that attaches to it. A fetus is developed from the body, not from outside.

Sure their are similarities, does not mean its a parasite. You are comparing symptoms and then using that to say a fetus could be a parasite. You are cherry picking to strengthen your argument.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
NattyDaddy604

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#7 NattyDaddy604
Member since 2019 • 304 Posts

@horgen: Are you still replying without posting any substance refuting my claims?

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
NattyDaddy604

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#8 NattyDaddy604
Member since 2019 • 304 Posts
@drlostrib said:

Parasitism is a symbiotic relationship

You are right. The correct answer is a mutualistic or commensalitic symbiotic relationship, not parasitic. My point still stands.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
NattyDaddy604

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#9 NattyDaddy604
Member since 2019 • 304 Posts

@horgen said:

It was never my intention, but rather to enlighten about what is considered a successful parasite since the definition of parasites came up.

Trying to demonstrate the similarities would be pointless. You will never accept them. Still, some I can think of right away are both get the nutrition they need from their host, as well as leaving the host to deal with the waste. Both generally create discomfort for the host.

Even for a healthy woman, being pregnant limits what one should do. I won't claim they are exactly the same, but given your post I think you have very little knowledge about pregnancy and even less about parasites.

>Claims he wants to provide "enlightenment"
>Does not provide any "enlightenment" because I will never accept them.
Typical leftist logic.

  1. A parasite is an organism of onespecies that lives in or on an organism of anotherspecies and receives nourishment from the host.
  2. Parasites are invasive organism that come from an outside or external source. A fetus comes from an inside or internal source (ie fertilized egg)
  3. Parasites are generally harmful to the hosts, fetuses may make a pregnant woman experience adverse health effects, but not nearly to the same level that a parasite generally does.
  4. A parasite makes directcontact with the host's living tissues. A fetus lives in the placenta, fed by the umbilical cord, both of which are fetal tissue (ie the cells come from the baby).
  5. When a parasite invades a host, the host tissue will usually respond by encapsulating the parasite in order tocut it offfrom other surrounding tissue. In the case of a fetus, the mother’s tissue will create a lining tissue that connects, rather than cuts off contact with other tissues (placenta lining).
  6. Parasites usually elicit asurge of antibodies as an immunological response. With the fetus, however, a mother’s trophoblast (the shell of cells surrounding the embryo) will naturally block these antibodies so as not to reject the fetus. This reaction is only found in the embryo-mother relationship.
  7. A parasite will generally weaken the cellular reproductive capacity of the host.For a fetus, the effect is the opposite.
  8. Parasites generallystay with the host for life, a fetus leaves upon birth.
  9. Parasitical relationships are mostlyharmful and unnecessary to the host, generally damaging the host in a variety of ways. A newborn (fetus post-birth) is very healthy for the mother, bringing benefits of an emotional, cognitive and chemical nature.
  10. The most obvious one, a fetus is a human being in development. It will never become anything other than human. Even a first trimester fetus will have fully developed arms, legs, ears, facial features, sex organs and a functioning heart, as well as sufficient neurological development to feel pain. A parasite is not a human and never will be.

Sounds like a symbiotic relationship to me.

Avatar image for nattydaddy604
NattyDaddy604

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#10 NattyDaddy604
Member since 2019 • 304 Posts

@mattbbpl said:

@Maroxad: The primary problem with globalization is simply that we've mismanaged it/failed to account for it's affects. That's not an issue inherent to gobalization itself, but it often appears to be from certain frames of reference.

LOLOL just like socialism and communism every time right? Delusional mindset