@se7en1989: how can you tell? I havent really noticed massive cheating. Ive been sniped at long range heaps, but then that happens in all Battlefields. Are you talking about some of the players that have 35-1 KDR's? This is why i love killcams, you can really see who is truly hacking and who isn't with a killcam.

@FBohler: Theres plenty of critics, that have taken the Zelda fanboy hat off and realized its not a 10 after a few hours into it.

@spartanx169x: I actually dont think you can really judge a game at all, until you have personally played it for over 3-5 hours. I wouldnt pay any attention to any scores. Unless its like a 2 or a 5 or something. Anything over that, you personally might love it or completely hate it or something in between. Ive played over 1000 hours of ARMA 2 , just in the editor, making original ghost recon style missions. They gave that a 7 i think. It's one of my most played games.

Thats a lot of people super keen to play a new Zelda.

I feel like taking sportsline "PICKS and STUPID Projections" to court for online harassment, because they are on every video I watch. It's worse than telemarketing. Every 100 videos, Sportsline takes 25 minutes away from my life.

@bodhi: I dont know, titanfall 2, Battlefield 1 etc looks pretty awesome. But everytime i boot up Crysis 1 on PC, im still shocked at how good that game looks today and ALSO shocked how we havent come much further than Crysis 1 graphics from 2006. But then there's certain times i look at watch dogs or even GTA 5 on PC, that i realize they have come a long way in those particular genres, for certain games and others are stagnant. I went back and played Farcry 1 not long ago, and you are totally right, it was SO colourful and vibrant.

I love the fact All the final fantasy games are on STEAM now, thx STEAM.

@Raidendude153: you can play offline mode with uplay.

This is the real issue i have and is making me want to wait for a giant price drop....everyone is putting MG5 and Ghost Recon in the same sentence. Thats not cool at all. Thats a real problem. I dont play Ghost Recon to get a Metal Gear experience or a Just Cause/MG5/Farcry experience. I would of preferred a calved up map in 20 or so sections. Complete tactical freedom within those 20 sections and a 1st person perspective. An improved Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter. Its really not cool, That people can literally compare a Ghost Recon and a Metal Gear Solid 5. Ghost recon Wildlands is WAY off track, if i can play it and think of Metal Gear. If you are looking for a true Ghost Recon experience. The only thing on offer..although complex. ARMA 3 online in ZEUS mode. About as tactical and believable as you are going to get.

@datriax: DOOM 3 was awesome, and RAGE could of been awesome, it just didnt know what it wanted to be, which isnt good. and I actually wish I saw a full product of DOOM 4. I at least cared enough about DOOM 3, to finish it over and over. I barely looked at DOOM 2016 ever again after the first play through, ive played through DOOm 1 and DOOM 2 and FINAL DOOM over and over and over, DOOM 3 numerous amounts of times. DOOM 2016......barely once. Just something about it, that doesnt feel replayable.