If you have enough money to release on multiple platforms, why limit yourself to one? Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo have in house developers that produce games in order to sell their respective consoles.. Unlike consoles, nobody owns PC Gaming, so developers are free to do as they please, since there's nobody stopping them from releasing games on multiple platforms, they produce multiplatform games, it's more profitable.. They don't care about "fanboy wars" lol

Yawn

@undefined: meh

@SolidGame_basic:

Likes: Graphics, Variety, Online Gaming

Dislikes: Too many hand holding elements, not enough focus on gameplay, pay to win, lack off multiplayer split screen games, and DLC.. There's more I just can't think of everything right now. lol

I just bought the first one a couple days ago for about $7.50. lol

Am I disappointed in State of Decay 2 being $30? No, but not because I feel like it "should" be a budget experience.. I just don't care, why would I want a video game to be more expensive? As a consumer, that doesn't make any sense. lol, like damn, man, I would've bought this game if it was $30 more. lol

EinuVei Thank yo, bro, I truely appreciate it, Dragon Age: Inquisition seems to be what I'm looking for.

@einuvei: NPCs

It's mainly because people feel as if they owe loyalty to their respective consoles

Back in my console peasant days, I bought a game for $60, at Gamestop to make matters worse.