[QUOTE="Cali3350"]N64 was most certainly the more powerful machine between it and the PS1. Just because you guys enjoyed the PS1 more doesnt change that fact. Sony has the history of the weakest console (and for the 3rd gen in a row the weakest console is dominating).zero_snake99

o_O wasnt the ps1 capable of rendering more polys at a constant fps?

comparing realistic multiformat games, shadowman ran in 640x480 on the n64 without a hitch, the ps1 version ran at 320x240 and was virtually unplayable, the world is not enough was the same.

silicon knights stated when producing eternal darkness originally n64 they could not run it on the ps1.

For some reason the AI seemed alot better in Halo 1 than Halo 2.

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

You sure you've actually played it? The bridge sequence alone was **** hectic and awesome.

Chutebox

You sure you've actually played it? The bridge sequence alone was **** hectic and awesome.

Chutebox

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko9xC6TMdiw

Killzone 2 delivered in terms of graphics, but look back at that E3 2005 trailer at those cinematic quality action sequences that put you right in the middle of a war. That's what I was most excited about, but the actual Killzone 2 plays like any other generic fps and did not come close to living up to that vision.

It's looked alot better over time, not worse. Early builds were pretty fugly. I'm not sure what your talking about.

I hated that weird texture pop-in in Halo 2's graphics.

I live with my gf and she has beaten Oot, is a champ at SSB, and rivals me at Perfect Dark 64.

Something about is just alot better. Cant put my finger on it.

[QUOTE="redfordo"]

[QUOTE="JordanElek"] People say that after EVERY positive Wii game review. "Oh, Super Mario Galaxy won Game of the Year? One game makes no difference, they still hate the Wii." Now, who knows how many good reviews later (somebody will probably provide the number, or already has), one more still doesn't make a difference?

JordanElek