Q6600 2.4 Ghz

3gigs of DDR2

P35D Motherboard

gtx 275

Found on your post history.

you overcloaked like you were trying?

Your rig is fine with 4gb... save for when you decide to upgrade to a ddr3 mobo, if you ever do...

I miself think you rig is great for now(going 4gb 64bit), and wouldn't bother upgrading parts, would be better to make a new PC from scratch later.

(you can use memory of diferent size on same mobo, only thing thing is that dual channel will always be of the lower size, frequency and latency of both)

So you could keep your memory but go for a larger single stick.

But again.. you won't see any gain on GAMES whatsoever.

what your PC specs?

Just put 1GB stick ddr2. Just so you can do dual channel, just don't forget to buy the same frequency you had, if you others ddr2 are 667,800 or 1033mhz buy the same frequency

There is no point on going 8gb ddr2, specially if you are just upgrading OS and not hardware, won't make you PC any better because the bottleneck will be the CPU/GPU or even motherboard data transfer.

The only reason to go past the 4gb sweet spot for gaming is if you running i7 cpu with DDR3 6GB and a very good motherboard and GPU.

GRIM FANDANGO

DIABLO 3 (i think diablo 3 will be multiplat, almost sure will come to ps3)

Sexy beach 3 (LOL)

Rapelay (LOL joke)

But I have a gaming PC. Altough is a 4 years old gaming PC is still more powerfull than my ps3 and 360 combined.

2006 PC

core2duo E6600 2.4ghz

4gb drr2 800mhz

8800gts 320mb OC

640gb 7200rpm

This is a joke thread right? PC gaming is not dying! Console gaming is not dying! NOTHING IS DYING.

ElTriforceo

I am dying since I have cancer.

Am I the only one who never takes pre-release screenshots seriously anymore? Sure, they're pretty to look at, but they're almost never indicative of how the final product will actually look.

Maybe I'm just cynical.

Jared2720

Remedy confirmed the pictures taken uses a post processing to enhance. Altough is from the engine, is not what you are going to see in the game as a consumer.

All those pics looks better than the game actually is.

Engine pics=/= in-game pics.

I prefer the ps3 LACK of triggers and the ps3 stick are WAY better than the 360. Better dead zone and acuaracy.

Only thing the 360 has advantage for me is that is more ergonomic.

1536/4=384

It appears Nvidia is keeping the 384bit memory system.

Same as the 4 year old 8800gtx

360 is dominant in america.

Americans are the ones that statiscally buy more games. (be it because the games are cheaper there, or because there is less piracy, or because there is more marketing there, or whatever reason they do... I do know that statiscally they buy morre)

Looking at both the above demonstrations of each motion control technology I personally think it's pretty obvious Arc is overall a little bit more responsive and accurate for motion control than the Wiimote with M+ and I think it's ultimately going to offer the better motion controls.

amaneuvering

It is obvious that ARC is way better than wiimote plus.

There is nothing to discuss... the ARC technology is BETTTER in every single way (technically speaking), not only that but both technology consume CPU to be used, and the fact the ps3 has more CPU will mean that it will also use the more advanced technology better that the wii ever could even if had the same camera tracking technology.

And too top it of the Ps3 ARC will most likely be more supported than wiimote plus, since after 1 year of PLUS launch, less than 10 game actually use it.

Ps3 ARC will have more than 10 games at launch for sure.