source: http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3167693
Sorry, but you had to see it coming after it was announced that Killzone 2 has been pushed back to 2009. My only question is if Sony was scared Resistance 2 and Killzone 2 would have taken sales from each other, wouldn't it make more sense to get the stronger product out during the holiday season rather than Resistance? I would have pushed Resistance 2 back and given it more time get it at Killzone 2's level.
What do you guys think? Would you have done the same, or had them go head to head, giving yourself potentially less sales but still creating one of those legendary holiday seasons like pc/360 '07 & pc '98, or would u have switched roles, pushing the stronger title out first?
Big_T-Mac
Here's what really matters. The first Killzone was a terrible, terrible game and I expect the second to be just as terrible or one less terrible thrown in to catch the amount of fail the series is. There is only one reason this game keeps getting delayed, it's terrible. They don't want to release Killzone 2 and be embarassed.
The first Resistance was a solid game. The second Resistance will be a solid game.
Resistance series > Killzone .
Log in to comment