@sinister1989: I'm with you. Game length isn't really indicative of a games quality. I know people like to judge if a game is worth the money based on how long it is or how much content it has but, for me, it's all about the overall entertainment and enjoyment I get from the game, similar to a movie.

This is perfect to me. Don't need the story to be much longer than that and with side missions it will last even longer, just hope they are fun.

Man, can't believe it's been 10 years since Dead Space came out. One of my favorite games of all time. Would love to see this series return. I'd even take a remaster of the original, or trilogy, but won't hold my breath.

@chippiez: some people take their fandom a little too serious, and Im not just talking wrestling fans. Whether it's a movie, tv show, videogame, etc the overreaction of fans when they are upset over something is a little ridiculous. At the end of the day it's just entertainment people. Not the end of the world if your expectations weren't met. These days there's an overload of entertainment and content available. If you disappointed by one thing just move on to something else. Chances are there's something else to fill your entertainment needs.

@olddadgamer: I pretty much feel the same way and will usually gauge reception to decide whether or not a particular movie is worth the watch. Although Bright supposedly did well in terms of views and critical reception was poor to average overall.

I'm not sure Netflix cares one way or another though. I'm sure they want quality original content but that's not exactly their main selling point, especially with movies. It's almost more of a bonus for people that subscribe rather than being the reason people have a membership.

"The movie will play on IMAX at four theatres in the United States."

You do know Toronto isn't in the US right? Unless you missed a theater or meant to say North America.

@chrono99: "lets face it lesnar isnt going to show up to fight anywhere unless vince gives him a dumptruck full of money being the prizefighter he is"

But Lesnar is under contract and getting paid...it shouldn't take an additional load of money for him to do a job he's already getting paid to do. If that is the case the blame falls on WWE and Vince for empowering Lesnar They negotiated the contract. They are the ones that should be running the show and calling the shots.

It might simply be a matter of what's in Lesnar's contract. In the past he was limited to a certain number of appearances so maybe this is the same case, perhaps with some additional privileges (maybe he does indeed have the option to choose who he wresltes, when he appears, and when he drops the belt).

The sad thing is there is a decade worth of content for the list and a majority of these segments are from the latter part of the decade, like the last 3 years or so. Some are from the last year. Just shows how far WWE has fallen when it comes to anything that isn't in-ring work and a lot of fans would argue NJPW blow them out of the water in that regard.

@m4a5: agree. Id go totally digital if it weren't for getting better deals on physical copies, especially with Best Buy GCU (while the membership lasts at least).

@mcnichoj: And I agree with that. He shouldn't be taking any unnecessary risks, which he has done a few times since returning. I just understand the mentality when you know you should take it easy or play it safe but physically your body feels good enough to do what you've always done. The thing that worries me about Bryan is the more he performs high risk moves and comes out unscathed the more confidence he's going to get to push his limits. And I feel like too many fans are so concerned about match quality that they won't think twice when Bryan performs a move that could potential end his career if not severely injure him permanently