i have a topic like this 2 but with resistance2 farcry2 socom and bioshock i can post my results if u want but from the results looks like resistance2 chrisp003

o well lol, i wouldnt have made this poll thread if i knew. no need posting results.

Made this poll because Socom was losing as hell on other poll thread (Socom vs Resistance 2), and lots of people's comments say Far cry will be better than both of them. So wanted to see which will get more votes this time.

Please vote and discuss.

[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="A-LEGEND"]

The problem with KZ2 is that technicallythe game is not impressive AT ALL. the textures are some of the worst (even though most people dont realise that you good textures mean high resolution textures, not pretty ones), terrible AA and its a CORRIDOR shooter. there is not much rendering at all. people fail to use rational logic on this forum.

now, the real problem with KZ2 is its motion blur. its ridiculous amount of motion blur which hides EVERYTHING. The game looks like ass in STILL screens, because of low poly everything, terrible textures, and lack of AA but AMAZING in motion because of the blur. this accomplishes two things. 1. it reveals how stupid and gullible the fans of the game are, and 2. it reveals how brilliant the developers are. The burden for the rest of the generation will be for other companies who release their games with ridiculously more advanced engines such as the UE3.5 (yes that includes gears of war 2 whether you like it or not), to actually convince these brainwashed fools that no KZ2 doesn't come close to many other games technically even though it looks BEST to the EYE.

A-LEGEND

Motion blur does not hide everything in the videos (maybe screen buffers which also washes out texture detail). How can you say that KZ2 is not technically impressive? Are you serious? I'm guessing you haven't seen any previous builds :?.

Try spinning around really fast in real life. There will be motion blur :).

I am absolutely serious that KZ2 is NOT technicaly impressive. and stop with the excuses that maybe its screen buffers. idiot. Its brainwashed people like you that other developpers who will be releasing games even BEFORE KZ2 will have trouble convincing of anything even if they waved it in your foolish faces. KZ2 may look pretty to your eyes, but its not when you look at the technology.

well wow? if it looks pretty good in your eyes, why not be technicaly impressive. Who cares what they done with the technology just as long as it looks pretty good in your eyes ok? so your the one being an idiot.

i been playin cod2 from 05-07with no problems and i wanted to play again 2day which is a year later, but framerate problems.

The computer is always been the same come on, something not right here.

The graphics get better and worse? Are you sure about that? I could see the framerate being different because of dust or open programs or something.DragonfireXZ95

well i think i know why now, its because i change the screen resolution lots of times. but... the computer is still weird.

i cant play cod2 anymore wtf, when i installed it like a month ago, the framerate was so bad that i cant understand whats going on.

You've got a Pentium 3? Now that's old.RK-Mara

ya i know its old, but i cant upgrade to pentium 4 because my computer is like almost 13 years old lol.

lol this is what the site said

"Well, you like Sony the best, but you aren't in love with them. Guess you're really not in love with video games period... or at least you're not obsessed with them. Which may not be a bad thing."

totally not true, i am obsessed and in love with video games, if im not why in the hell am i here, lmao?

[QUOTE="sethman410"]

1280 by 1024.

ok thanks.

teardropmina

this. the farthest right of the scale.