sexygirl6t9's forum posts
[QUOTE="sexygirl6t9"]
[QUOTE="dakan45"]
Meh they jus pissed that perks and unlocked weapons are actually powerfull and not useless in the name of "balancing"
In any case i liked what they did with mw2. Less players, less overcowded maps. No mods or dedicated servers, being able to find a freaking match that is not moded to death like it happened in cod4 and counter strike. Also less laggy than black ops.FelipeInside
bad comparisons in that link.
Just cause you hate/troll every CoD release.
I think every CoD game that came out looked better on each release....
Black Ops had awe-inspiring moments and I'm sure MW3 will have them as well....
Just because you don't like my responses doesn't mean it's a troll.
I like the original COD and COD 2. COD 4 single player was ok.
MW2 got stale very fast. It's an arcade shooter with a crappy match making system, bad maps, spawn system sucks, assault rifles are a joke, and there are a lot of cheaters (no I am not bad).
Black Ops is no better.
[QUOTE="ampiva"]It looks just like COD4.dakan45
http://www.gamespot.com/features/6283992/call-of-duty-then-and-now/?tag=result%3Btitle%3B1
Most people still hate them for no dedicated servers. I don't mind matchmaking that much though. Although, I think they should do what DICE did with Medal of Honor and give you the option to choose your server or get matched into a server. That was pretty cool.Phoenix534
Meh they jus pissed that perks and unlocked weapons are actually powerfull and not useless in the name of "balancing"
In any case i liked what they did with mw2. Less players, less overcowded maps. No mods or dedicated servers, being able to find a freaking match that is not moded to death like it happened in cod4 and counter strike. Also less laggy than black ops.
bad comparisons in that link.
[QUOTE="sexygirl6t9"][QUOTE="Baranga"]are you joking...? The campaign in MW2 was atrocious. The original games had the better campaign. COD 4 is decent. Bad Company 2 is just the same. How people praise these 2 games is beyond me. Campaign was terribad. Way too easy, squad was 100% useless, story was total garbage, guns were lame, and the areas sucked. Maybe war fps are not ur kind of game? As for the campaign....yes I'm interested in playing World War 3....although I got a bit lost in the story with mw2 I don't buy FPS for the Single Player. After playing RPGs so long I cannot stand linear non open world games. Saying that however doesn't change the fact that the campaign does indeed BLOW in these 2 games. I love war games and FPS, but the campaigns sucked.Anyone else here that cares more about the campaign?
FelipeInside
are you joking...? The campaign in MW2 was atrocious. The original games had the better campaign. COD 4 is decent. Bad Company 2 is just the same. How people praise these 2 games is beyond me. Campaign was terribad. Way too easy, squad was 100% useless, story was total garbage, guns were lame, and the areas sucked.Anyone else here that cares more about the campaign?
Baranga
Log in to comment