[QUOTE="shahilsyed"]
These are my opinion so please dont flame me if you dont agree, please respect them.
I picked up Resistance 3 yesterday, was very disappointed after I completed the game, it was very average. Nothing like how PS3 fans hyped. I will state the good points and bad points.
Single Player
Good points:
1. Very Good graphics
2. Good Voice acting
Bad Points
1. Very Short, only 4-5 hour campaign. I really expected something like 6-8 hour campaign, I expect a long campaign if I pay $60 for it. There are some exceptions like Halo, COD where a short campaign is enough because there are other content like zombies, firefight, multiplayer which make up the cost. In this case, Resistance 3 has a very boring generic multiplayer which I will talk about.
2. Generic, Repetitive, boring. In the 4 hour campaign of the campaign, all it was, which was just run, shoot and move on to next objective. The game included no variations, different type of gameplay missions. At least in Halo reach, there were railshooter missions, space missions which werent generic and boring. In R3, it gets too boring too fast because it is the same gameplay over and over.
3. Bad Framerates, whenever there are alot of explosions, action going on. The game's framerate drops down below average and its turns horrible, it's like a slideshow.
Multiplayer
Good Points
Can be fun for a short amount of time.
Bad Points
1. The Balancing system sucks, Many times you will find yourself in a game, where there's only 2 players in one team and 8 players on the other which leads to mean the matchmaking sucks because it doesnt bring any new players into the game.
2. No new things added, I'm sorry but there is nothing new in this game that doesnt exist in other games, there are game modes that exist in all FPS games, v ery generic game modes like CTF. Nothing new. Nothing innovative. I rather play COD than this.
3. Spawns are horrid, alot of times you will find yourself spawning in front of a enemy which will obviously be an easy target for the enemy. You will also alot of times get spawned in the same place you get killed.
4. Framerates are also bad in this.
IMO, the conclusion is R3 had a huge potential being a great game and it failed for me. It sucked, it added nothing new to the series, same crap that exist other games, multiplayer is very bland. I think Halo reach was thousand times better.
campzor
you had me going for a while until i got upto that bit.
The amount of times ive done that exact 'protect the ship' 'defend against enemy ships inbound in waves' before is not funny. It was very generic.
Also i agree with ur opinion soley on the fact that i did not enjoy reach and that you keep comparing resistance to it thus your taste is completely different to mine. I also question the time it took you to beat the campaign as the past resistance games have taken me between 8-10 hours to complete and i doubt they would reduce it by 3 hours :|
I The space mission in Reach was totally different thing in the franchise, it was the first time you were able to do that kind of stuff in Halo. Lets not say it took me 4 hours but it defitinitely is 5 hours so sadly yes they did reduce the length. 
Log in to comment