shahilsyed's forum posts

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

I am pretty tired from hearing from BF fanboys saying how MW3 is the same game as MW2 and how it is a DLC. I am getting pretty annoyed. Mw3 will be differemt than MW2, far different. I think Battlefield 3 though will be a better game but Mw3 in no shape of form is same game. I will list all the things that will be different.

1. Different and more weapons

2. Totally new game mode which is the survival special ops mode.

3. New perks

4. Killstreaks are changed, they work different. They are now Pointstreaks.

5. Totally new campaign

6. New Special Ops missions

7. New Pointstreak rewards

8. New attachments

9. New challenges for guns

10. New multiplayer maps

11. New teams

MW3 is certainly worth the price tag, In no means it is same as Mw2.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

I dont recommend anyone the map pack for Moon. Its horrible.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

Firstly, the doors in the map are horrible and horrendous. They are like doors from the vaults from fallout. Alot of times, you will walk through the door and you will find yourself alot of times, literally 30 zombie crowding outside the door. Getting Juggernog is very unlikely. There are also these new enemies who are extremely slow, they follow you around and if you go near them, they grab you and you will loose your perks. They have ridicolous range of grabbing you. I once managed to buy juggernog and I walked past those guys and he managed to grab me and I lost my perks.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

The service requires a very very fast internet to play a game at 60fps, no lag. I have the fastest internet, I tried some trial games and they lag extremely. Also there's no point. I already got a xbox 360 and PC that plays the exactly same games as Onlive does. Onlive also has no exclusives so there is no point really. I own the thing and I got rid of it on ebay.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts
The only reason why COD sells more because more casual players and kids prefer it because it's easy to play and get into. It's as simple as that.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="xXasa97Xx"]Battlefield games have crappy campaigns.DangerousLiquid

Which Battlefield game have you played that had a 'crappy' campaign?

Which BF game has high-quality campaign (this will be fun)?

Battlefield Bad company had a very good campaign. Battlefield was never meant for the campaign. It was always a multiplayers and always will. I'll admit one thing though, Call of duty campaigns are very good, they have solid stories.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts
Battlefield games have crappy campaigns.xXasa97Xx
Which Battlefield game have you played that had a 'crappy' campaign?
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

BF uses a similar things to a class system.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="DangerousLiquid"]

What kind of proof do you have? Please give me some. You're dead wrong. COD is by far the most popular on PSN.

DangerousLiquid

No, COD is not the most played game on PSN, it is probably Killzone 3 atm. Just face it, 90% players of COD are either 12 year olds or casual players. Games like Battlefield, Counterstrike have more hardcore players.

YES IT IS. I have proof Black Ops outsold any PS3 game, so it's probably true. If you think COD games sell only on 360, you are dead wrong. Stop living in a fantasy world.

COD on PS3 alone is more popular than the entire BF series on all platforms... Lmao!

You do realize most people who buy COD are either 12 year olds or casual players. On the other hand, battlefield has core gamers. There is a difference. 95% people who buy COD are 12 year olds or casual gamers, 5% are core gamers. For battlefield, it's opposite. Casual gamers and 12 year olds prefer COD because its 'EASY' to play and get into.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="DangerousLiquid"]

Bad Company or not, made by the same DEV, PLAYS THE SAME, and is boring (at least me and 30 million others think so).

If you want to play BF, then go and do so. But it's simply an extremely BORING game, which is based on camping and nothing else. If you suck at CoD, and have your grandma's reflexes, go play BF.

DangerousLiquid

Seriously, How old are you? Call of duty 2 and MW2 are developed by same companies but they play extremely different. Bad company was made for 'consoles' and Battlefield is made for PC gamers. I don't suck at COD, My K/D ratio is 2.21 on COD. Battlefield is not about camping. Battlefield is about objectives. Camping in Battlefield will get you nowhere but in COD, it will.

Yes, you probably suck, and your reflexes suck, and you got tired of getting nuked, so you switched?

Also, bad news. The consolization of BF3 has impacted the PC version heavily, in a bad way.

And I've camped in BF with a sniper rifle in many bushes and gotten far with it... In CoD, you get nowhere because it's fast-paced.

So you camp in Battlefield? No wonder........ In COD, you must've camped, you probably rack up kills and earn killstreaks to dominate games. In battlefield, there is none of that crap. In battlefield, you must've camped and you didnt get rewarded like in COD. Consolization hasnt really affected anything as far I know.