shahilsyed's forum posts

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="DangerousLiquid"]

You couldn't be more wrong... CoD is insanely popular on the PS3, too. And the best-selling franchise there (as well as on 360).

DangerousLiquid

Actually, I was wrong. the most played game in PSN is socom confrontation. sales does not mean its the most played game online, not every person of the millions who bought cod for the PS3 plays it anymore, and even those who keep playing doesnt necessarily play online. you present no facts, you are just a fanboy.

What kind of proof do you have? Please give me some. You're dead wrong. COD is by far the most popular on PSN.

No, COD is not the most played game on PSN, it is probably Killzone 3 atm. Just face it, 90% players of COD are either 12 year olds or casual players. Games like Battlefield, Counterstrike have more hardcore players.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Battlefield runs on dedicated servers, MW3 runs on laggy p2p TBH I've felt more lag in Battlefield games compared to CoD, EA has awful servers.

Battlefield has a higher play count, MW3 same old small number Doesn't necessarily make the game better

Battlefield 3 has bigger maps same as above

Battlefield 3 has destructable environemnts, MW3 does not same as above

Battlfefield 3 has a wide range vehicles, MW3 has nothing same as above

Battlefield 3 has better graphics and is on a more powerful engine, MW3 is the same old COD engine and graphics same as above

Battlefield 3 is more realistic like bullets dropping over long distances ect.., MW3 is all about shooting two guns at once and knifing a guy 10 feet away same as above

Battlefield 3 has FULLY customizabel weapons, MW3 just has the same old attachments same as above

Battlefield 3 developers give things to their customers for free and don't charge for stupid stuff, MW3 will have the same rehashed 5 maps for 20$ and will chage for elite mode I wanna know which proper map pack did DICE give to us free of charge

Overall it's pretty obvious that Battlefield 3 is the superior product No it's not

Harisemo

MW3 has fun fastand addictive gameplay, I can easily see why one would prefer it over BF3

Haha, you said Battlefield is more laggy than COD. LOL! Have you played any battlefield games on the PC? Even on the consoles, COD runs on P2P servers.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"]

[QUOTE="DangerousLiquid"]

Why play BF? It's BORING.

We don't play COD because we love Activision or because we hate DICE or EA. We play it because it's so much more entertaining than that sleeping pill called BF. No fanboy love here.

DangerousLiquid

No you're BORING. Battlefield is not boring. You're just a plain fanboy which clearly you have not got a clue on what you're talking about. Also read my long reply. Couldn't believe how you think Bad company is the same series as battlefield. I suspect you being a 12 year old ignorant cock sucking piece of crap.

Bad Company or not, made by the same DEV, PLAYS THE SAME, and is boring (at least me and 30 million others think so).

If you want to play BF, then go and do so. But it's simply an extremely BORING game, which is based on camping and nothing else. If you suck at CoD, and have your grandma's reflexes, go play BF.

Seriously, How old are you? Call of duty 2 and MW2 are developed by same companies but they play extremely different. Bad company was made for 'consoles' and Battlefield is made for PC gamers. I don't suck at COD, My K/D ratio is 2.21 on COD. Battlefield is not about camping. Battlefield is about objectives. Camping in Battlefield will get you nowhere but in COD, it will.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

*expects DangerousLiquid to post*

People will buy MW3 over BF3 because they dont have the skill to play more difficult games like Battlefield.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts
[QUOTE="Cloud_765"]Hey everyone. Stop playing COD. Switch to Battlefield. That would be fun to see COD die.

They probably wont, they will stick to it. It's a game which is easy to get into, easy to get kills, very rewarding even when you're terrible at the game. There are no other FPS games that follows and shares the same aspect as COD as. Them playing Battlefield will be far too hard for them to even handle
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

OK, I am going to clear out some things here so ignorant isnt much of a factor.

COD is an arcady, eas, run and gunning sort of shooter. It is meant to be like that. It is not realistic because it is not meant to be and also Call of duty was meant to attract a wider audience so that way is more dumbed down and it's easier to play. COD fans like their games because its a franchise that constantly has games coming out every year, its also easy to get into and it has alot of gadgets which are fun to use.

Battlefield on the other side is a realistic, more teamwork required, cant run and gun, kills are not a factor. Someone like DangerousLiquid saying that Battlefield is not fun and that COD is fun has no clue and they never played a battlefield nor should they play a COD because they are mostly 12.

Now, To say. Bad Company 2 and battlefield 3 are not in the same series. They are completely different. This is like saying Black ops and Modern warfare gamea are in the same series. They're not. Sure, they are in the same franchise. Now the story is with this is that Battlefield 2 came out in 2005 which only came out for the PC only. Console gamers meanwhile were complaining to DICE that they should of got battlefield 2. So DICE's decided that they wont release battlefield 2 on the consoles but they said they will make a sub-series for the console gamers so they get a taste of battlefield. DICE then released bad company in 2007 for the consoles only and they carried on with the 'series'. Bad company series was a filler for the console gamers so they dont get left out of the picture. Bad company games were supposed and especially made for consoles so thats the reason you'll find alot of consolized stuff because its made for consoles. 'Battlefield' however on the other side was a series especially for the PC so it will be much different. Hope this clears out alot of confusion.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts
Quickscoping and tomahawking take skill, no-scoping takes luck.Messiahbolical-
Well said.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

can sony vaio laptops be good gaming laptops?

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

quickscoping does take skill