Most probably know I'm a big Kobe fan, but I'm also a fair-minded person. If I would place Kobe first it would be because of what he has done in past years and therefore what I know he can do now if his team needed it(which it does tonight because the Blazers are waxin' the Lakers right now). I remember Kobe's 40+month of Feb, 2003(with a good number of rbs and assists too). Also his 5 straight games of 50 points, 81 in a game, 62 in 3 quarters.....etc. Lebron and Wade have yet to match those type of performances over the length of time that Kobe has.
Having said all that, for this season I could easily agree with 1-Wade, 2-Lebron, 3-Kobe. Wade is hoopin', big time! I'm surprised Wade is not getting as much press as Lebron (but not really). The NBA has already crowned Lebron "King" before he has won a ring.
But, if Wade gets MVP this yearthe league should take those from Nash and Nowitski and give them to Kobe, imo. Which is it (MVP), Best player or Best player on one of the best teams?? I think MVP should always be "Best player with the most valuable basketball skills"
i have to disagree w/ that last part. I don't think it should be the best player, because if that was the case MJ would have had 11-12 MVP's and Kobe would prob be on 4-5 right about now. I think most "valuable" implies the importance to their team and what would happen if they were removed. The 2 MVP's for Nash were legit because you could see how that team functioned when he was hurt, or just on the bench resting. It was like that team forgot how to play basketball. Where if my memory serves me correctly, the Lakers were about a .500 team during those years, and they had around a .500 record in games Kobe didn't play. Now does this mean Nash is better than Kobe, of course not, but his value during those years weren't as important as Nash. That's why Lebron will win this year. He's on one of, if not teh best team in the game, and he has a hand in every aspect of the game.
Log in to comment