Right on, chap...
Okay, so I've been a user of Windows Vista for a few weeks now. So I think some people would like to know my own opinions of this OS, now that I have some experience. Let's see.
The Good:
Visual appearance (gee, what a surprise)
Oh yeah, it looks good, I can't deny it. Also, if you enable Aero, you can browse all your open windows through a 3D pile of windows, which is pretty usable if you need it. The downside i, that using Aero naturally requires some attention from the GFX -card and the processor, but with a new powerful PC that is not a problem. Of course, all the "candy-effects" can be easily turned off if one desires so, which grants it vain to whine about the "heavy graphics" of Vista if one doesn't turn them off.
DirectX 10
It has worked so far. Although there are very few pieces of software that actually use DX10 -exclusive features, it still seems to be able to obtain slight advantages on the latests benchmarks. For example, on 3DMark06, I got a better score with Vista than the results on the web indicate on XP. Interesting indeed.
Of course, on slightly older DX9 games, Vista usually performs a bit more slower (that is 1-3% maximum), but that can easily be explained. Those older games were made and optimized for XP, without even knowing the existence of Vista. I can still remember people complaining about XP when it was released, when some of the Windows 98/ME games refused completely to work with the new and "heavy" XP.
Anyway, the main difference of DX10 to previous versions is, that for the first time the Direct X -graphics library has been attached on top of the OS, while the older ones were external libraries. This of course created some latencies, but in the future this should show in nice performance boost when new game applications learn to use it for their advantage.
Usability with a powerful PC.
Since having a dual-core CPU and a nice bunch of memory (2GB+), Vista is very smooth and fast to use. This happens also while maintaining the best outfit Vista can offer, so I really can't complain about it. This has been resulted with the effective use of HDD and RAM. Windows XP used memory and HDD pretty carefully, just not to hog up the system. This is understandable, while considering the year 2001, when XP was released. This is the main reason why most people complain about Vista being very slow on their computer. Maybe it would be nice to upgrade the PC once in every 5-6 years, at least?
I know it's about the money. I understand if one doesn't have enough such money for a new PC, but at least in that case it's not justified complain about an OS which you clearly no enough hardware to run. If you can lift a toy car in the air, but not a full-sized city-roamer, it's not the fault of the car.
Security
So far, the security mechanism has been pretty good for my usage. It hasn't let any malicious stuff through and it's pretty easy to customize. This is a clear advantage over XP's weak native firewall.
The Bad:
Requires some heavy components.
As I stated before, if one desires to enjoy Vista with full speed, you need some serious hardware under the hood. The older systems usually tend to hog up with the usage of Vista.
The price. Gee.
This is the main downside of the OS. The price. The cheapest one is something like 129e and Windows Vista Ultimate is like 300e. That's simply to say it: ridiculous. For my own fortune I got a free copy of Windows Vista Business via my school, but that's not the case for everyone.
Some minor problems.
While being a fresh OS, there are naturally some issues. Once again people seem to have forgotten the launch of XP, which wasn't the smoothest one either. I can still remember the numerous game issues while trying to use my Windows 98 -games on XP. Runtime error, anyone?
Some changes require some knee-deep digging.
There are some distracting features enabled in the fresh installation. For me, the only one was this prompt "Cancel or allow" or double-confirming if I'm copying a file or deleting one. Maybe those are appropriate for beginners, but I hardly consider myself one. There's a way to disable this User Access Control, but it's quite well hidden.
I've received a lot of complaints (mostly whinings) about Vista being slow and irritating, All I can say that with a efficient PC and some know-how you can make the system pretty much the same as XP, while being efficient to use it as well. Also, most of the current games work 1-3% slower than on XP, but that's just because those games were optimized for XP. With a powerful machine, it really doesn't matter whether I have 130 or 136 FPS on a certain game. It's fast enough for my senses.
Before starting to give your (probably negative) comments on Vista: PLEASE try to remember the launch of XP. It wasn't a dance with roses. I would claim it was worse.
Log in to comment