I'm not sure I understand the logic of this thread. Why are we declaring the graphics was over based on one game? Using that logic it was over when GoW was released and no further games are allowed to be considered, which is what you're saying right? Uncharted is the best looking game (in your opinion) and nothing released on the 360 after can be considered?

Anyway, comparing different games isn't necessarily indicative of the hardware, why don't you compare the same games, i.e multiplats? Actually that argument would be suicide considering pretty much all the multiplats look better on the 360. :P

You do know what "Prologue" means right?

xTHExJUICEx

noun, verb, Prologue, 'to Prologue'. noun


1. To enable receipt of monies multiple times for the same video game content.

see also: Fleece, Exploit, Rip-Off

dictionary

b) Its Gran Turismo, everyone already knows that its king **** and can't be touched. Non biased reviews aren't even needed.

roadkill88

The only people that think that are PD and deluded fanboys stuck in 1998.

Arguing over the amount of content in prologue and if it's a demo or not is completely missing the point. GT5P is a way for PD to fleece impatient fans by making them pay for the same content twice, this to me is exploitation and doesn't send a good message to developers.

It's shocking how many people either don't realise this or are just too fond of the series that they can overlook it. What next, selling the first 20mins of films before they've finished shooting the whole thing?? Every time I see GT5P on the shelf being sold as a full game it amazes me at the sheer nerve of PD, they must be laughing all the way to the bank.

Seriously people get a grip, you're being ripped off.

Where does it say that on IGN, I can only find this bit (they even misuse the term 'render passing')

"Nor is it in the visual department, because visual issues are virtually negligible. For example, the 360 has some harder edges to some characters during cutscenes, and a little more screen tearing than the PS3 at times. The PS3 can be a wee bit darker during some scenes, though. Both systems show off a certain amount of render passing that pops into focus on sweeping vista shots, but they occur at the same time on each system and are quickly dismissed. However, observing these differences will only come via frame-by-frame analysis of each game side-by-side."

How can anyone who doesn't have vaseline smeared on their retinas say the PS3 version looks better? It uses a horrible blend effect to reduce aliasing.

http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/4697/dmc46iy1.gif