@bsford so, what you're saying is, a $5 microphone would've been just as good.......

Nintendo is trying really hard to become irrelevant.

Games get their greatest exposure via Youtube. It's free advertising for them with a huge audience. If I cant see a game review or gameplay through a Youtuber I trust, then I am very unlikely to purchase.

Sony and/or Bungie need to do something about "Chris". If not, then the internet will target him.

@ScottOakley They copyright the proper name of "Fallout" not the word itself. In court they would need to prove that there is a reasonable chance consumers would mistaken Fortress Fallout for a "Fallout" IP. They don't own the word and cant stop others from using it. The problem is that it takes money to have lawyers to take your case to court. These small devs lose even if they win.

Mojang could've fought them, because "Scrolls" had nothing to do with the "The Elder Scrolls" and there was no chance of mistake.

Lawyers are the scum of the Earth. It's all about money, and everyone loses except the lawyers.

I don't care about all the cosmetic DLC. But $15 per monster and only 3 included in the base game. That equals a no buy!

20 year old kid??

I'm sure he appreciates the insult

@Gelugon_baat @straightcur I really don't care what you call me. Seems like compliments when it protects consumers.

@Gelugon_baat "Benefit of the doubt" is exactly what shouldn't take place in a review.

@Gelugon_baat @straightcur No, the conflict of interest exists! But I am not calling GS guilty at all. There doesn't need to be anything nefarious going on for there to be a conflict of interest.