superferret2029's forum posts

Avatar image for superferret2029
superferret2029

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 superferret2029
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts

lol this thread is the funniest thread i've came across in months!!!!! br0kenrabbit he can't reply to you with any actual civil response because he knows he failed and failed hard, he just wants to try to leave this thread with some sort of victory thats why he keeps posting all of these troll responses.LibertySaint

LOLz too funnyz OMG this is too goodz!!

Seriously even PC Magazines facts show Cell PWNEs 360 PPC

Avatar image for superferret2029
superferret2029

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 superferret2029
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="superferret2029"][QUOTE="loftus42"][QUOTE="superferret2029"][QUOTE="lolkie_81"][QUOTE="superferret2029"]

the only thing that has changed is that the cell in a ps3 is not built using a 65nm process down from 90nm making is more power efficient and less prone to over heating. open up your console and take a look for yourself. nothing has changed.btw those were not reviews. they were news articles. get your facts str8

russdmoore

Hey, here's a question. If the Cell BBE is so efficient, why is there no hardware branch predictor? Why do fetches ops from branch target take a full 23 CLK cycles to complete? And if the prediction is wrong (remember, no hardware branch predictor) it has to start over again.

oh nos! you gotz mez! LOLs

look man, leave the gibberish you looked up on google and check PCMag.com's news with the link i posted on the first page. PLAIN AND SIMPLE PS3 Cell> 360 PowerPC. Its FACTS YALL. READ IT. even PCMagazine says it. pwned

Avatar image for superferret2029
superferret2029

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 superferret2029
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts
[QUOTE="superferret2029"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="superferret2029"]

loftus42

Actually, it means 'about' or 'around'. Look it up yourself.

deps if it preceeds the date or not

Wait, wait... I've heard this before..... Depends on what the word is is. Right? It means what he said. Don't try to make a word fit your meaning. See, I knew you were going to come up with something good. LOL

:|

Avatar image for superferret2029
superferret2029

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 superferret2029
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts
[QUOTE="superferret2029"]

and it it means 'roughly' or 'around' or 'approximately' why did you imply i said 2007. pwned

br0kenrabbit

N00b check the meaning of 'circa'!!! LMAO SELF OWNED! it means 'before' or 'pre'!:lol:

superferret2029

You're starting to look really, really ignorant about now. Do you really want to get into a technical argument with me? Because I'll roll your eyes around with code if you want me to. And you can't even define a simple word and contradict yourself as posted above, besides from the fact that your technical knowledge appears strictly limited to Google and you use it like someone trying to speak Chinese for the first time asking for the bathroom and end up asking some guy to kiss you. You do not know what you're talking about.

dude i wont even bother continuing any conversation with you. you are self owning. *face palm*

Avatar image for superferret2029
superferret2029

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 superferret2029
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts
[QUOTE="superferret2029"][QUOTE="lolkie_81"][QUOTE="superferret2029"]

loftus42

i dont get my help from google. by the way the facts about my argument are on PC Mag and they lay it out clear as day. check links out on the first page. PS3>360

Both are from nov. 2005, Before the 360, and way before the PS3. things have changed. this was pre release information, and theoretical numbers. Find newer reviews and restate your hypothesis.

the only thing that has changed is that the cell in a ps3 is not built using a 65nm process down from 90nm making is more power efficient and less prone to over heating. open up your console and take a look for yourself. nothing has changed.btw those were not reviews. they were news articles. get your facts str8

Avatar image for superferret2029
superferret2029

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 superferret2029
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts
[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="superferret2029"]

N00b check the meaning of 'circa'!!! LMAO SELF OWNED! it means 'before' or 'pre'!:lol:

superferret2029

Actually, it means 'about' or 'around'. Look it up yourself.

and it it means 'roughly' or 'around' or 'approximately' why did you imply i said 2007. pwned

Avatar image for superferret2029
superferret2029

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 superferret2029
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts
[QUOTE="superferret2029"]

N00b check the meaning of 'circa'!!! LMAO SELF OWNED! it means 'before' or 'pre'!:lol:

br0kenrabbit

Actually, it means 'about' or 'around'. Look it up yourself.

deps if it preceeds the date or not

Avatar image for superferret2029
superferret2029

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 superferret2029
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts

TC, the Cell is meant for hard core floating point operations and developers are not used to that kind of architecture and is not best suited for games. What it IS good for is ray-tracing and physics and I've even heard that future TV's might use the Cell.

You can throw all the theoretical bull**** that you want at everyone, but the point stands that the PS3 is not best suited for video game developers and never will be.

Vax45

no one is talking about what is better suited for devs. Im just simply stating that the cell>360 with facts and links.

Avatar image for superferret2029
superferret2029

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 superferret2029
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts
[QUOTE="superferret2029"][QUOTE="superferret2029"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"][QUOTE="superferret2029"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"][QUOTE="superferret2029"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"][QUOTE="superferret2029"][QUOTE="bungie93"]

Wow, so a 2005 GPU is based on cards released in 2007? Wouldn't that mean those cards GPU's would be based on the Xeos and not the other way around? You're correct in that unified shaders DON'T make a card DX10 capable, but having many of the functions that DX10 incorporates accelerated in hardware does, and the Xeos DOES have SOME DX10 features in it. I never said it had all, but it has more DX10 features than RSX does. I never claimed it was a DX10 "beast" either. Don't put words in my mouth. DX is an API, but GPU's typically are DX accelerators(and OGL accelerators). To run DX software accectably you need the software(the API)and you need a GPU that can run those instructions(ie hardware accelerated)...to call it software based is a misnomer, because a software only solution would be too slow to use.

Steppy_76

Just give up dude, the things you do sort of seem to understand you are misapplying to the argument.

N00b check the meaning of 'circa'!!! LMAO SELF OWNED! it means 'before' or 'pre'!:lol:

Avatar image for superferret2029
superferret2029

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 superferret2029
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts
[QUOTE="lolkie_81"][QUOTE="superferret2029"]

all lemmings have failed. none of you can even comprehend what i have been saying so i dont really expect any of you to be able to make any passable argument. n00bs

:lol:

superferret2029

No help from google? You have failed no one believes you or cares. Is this what you made a new account for? You dont know what you are talking about, but dont post like a new account holder. It seems like you have been on Sw before.

lol if you dont care why do you keep postin in my thread LOLz!:lol: