[QUOTE="Shame-usBlackley"]There's no controversy- he's just dumb. There are already PC games that already chew through nearly the same amount of memory already (Battlefield 3, for example). Just because the vast majority of games are still playable on XP (which is where the bulk of those 32-bit users are). doesn't mean that many enthusiast PCs are not already capable of this- they're just waiting on the games. I'm quite sure there are millions of PCs that have specs that can compete with/exceed the PS4. In fact, I don't blame most of the XP users for not feeling super compelled to upgrade- hardly any games are taking advantage of the extreme advantage the PC has in power over current console hardware. Porting a console game that only uses 512mb total ram (system and video) should not take more than 2GB of system ram and 512mb of video ram.I think when you take his entire conversation into account, and not just the "perfect gaming PC line" he makes a lot of logical points. The PS4 is not going to have to run a bloated OS. The PS4 is going to have a very large amount of RAM. The PS4 is going to be easy to develop on, and is designed around more than just specs.Ā
How is this even controversial?
LongZhiZi
I wouldn't call a major game dev dumb. He has to respond to the market. Because a significant portion of the market has the memory limitations due to 64 bit OS, they have to devote resources to making the game work within those limitations. Furthermore, map designs have to cater to the limit.Ā
Log in to comment