As you all know there are some big issues going into 2006 when it comes to the violence in videogames. I work at a GameStop and yes we do have signs up with the ratings on it, but also when a mature game comes up a message comes up on the screen saying that this is a Mature game which then we ask the person buying the game if he/she is the age of 17 or over. But to me this just isn't enough.
Do I think that these laws will help HELL NO! All that is doing is giving the government control of something that they don't truly understand. So what should be done to insure that these games are not getting into the hands of kids? I say that we need to rebuild the whole rating system. I the ESRB is doing one hell of a job but we need new ratings. E, T,M,A are just not enough to cover everything. I think we need something between either E and T or T and M. So that way M will carry alot more force when people pick up the game. I also think that A should come into play more.
You got games now that don't even touch on the A expect for Condemned. This game was SERIOUS. But it got an M rating. WHY!!! I heard alot about this game by working at GameStop and it seems as if it should of gotten an A rating. But it didn't. Why? Cause developers think an M rated game is more acceptiable than a A rated game when it comes to the public. Plus it would be easy marketing. You can't advertise an A rated game during a football game.
So why don't developers imbrace the A? Your answer is as good as mine. It seems as if we are putting TOO much weight into mature games when there is an A rated after it. Why aren't we using all the ratings like the movie industry? Only the developers and publishers can answer this question.
Well that is all for this week. Remember that the ideas and thoughts of these blogs are my own so don't get mad about something I said. Just comment on it. Check back next week when I will be giving my thoughts on WTF is going on with G4 Videogame TV.
Log in to comment