For me its God of war 3, Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, MLB 08-10 the show. And MGS4. All these games make the 360's best looking games look likeXbox 1games.
thekey's forum posts
You don't because your not used to playing great games. You didn't come from the era were a really bad game was "RARE". It's actually to your benefit to to play a game like Mass effect 2 again. why? because you have missed something that you didn't pick up on before. I mean are you not going to watch a movie you enjoyed before?i seriously don't understand this at all. doesnt it feel boring to play the same levels again after finishing it? ive seen ppl finishing mass effect 2 3 times (30 hour long campaign lol) and more and wanting to play even more!!! i finished mass effect 2 also and i must say that it is an AMAZING game that attacked my every feeling and emotion. it was toooooo fun. at the end i wanted to try out all the other classes. so i did new game plus and played vanguard cuz of the ownage charge move. but i just couldn't enjoy it even tho mass effect 2 was super fun. this applies to all games. i just cant enjoy it no matter how fun the game is.
parkour-rulz
[QUOTE="thekey"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]
um... yeah... are you sure the reason its been selling relatively well wasnt cause the recent price drop? not the games?
The reasons for the increase in sales is because of price drop and the recent game releases also.considering that the ps3 hasnt had any massive sellers during this period... i would venture to say the ONLY reason the ps3 has been selling well is the price drop and great advertising, not games.
Are you blind? Uncharted 2 is alread close to 3 million copies sold. For example.[QUOTE="thekey"][QUOTE="garland51"]
The question is, can Sony even afford to match up with the X-Box 720 when they've now lost nearly 5 billion smackeroonies off of the gaming division? I also forgot to mention that if those 1st party devs give the same amount of time & money for both Killzone 2 & Uncharted 2 on the 360, it will look exactly the same on the 360.
No it wouldn't because the 360 and PS3 perform very differently and also the 360's storage media space is more limited. And compress files make for a reduction of High Deffinition quality.All right, now thatis total BS. The PS3 resorts to installing data onto the HDD for increased loading times, while also repeating data onto the Blu-Ray for speed purposes. Also, the only thing uncompressed on the PS3 is audio, and that took up the bulk of the MGS4 disc.
What you said was total BS. Because not all PS3 games work that way. The uncompressed files are both video and audio. MGS4 is on a 50GB blu-ray disc and yes it's true that Hideo Kojima was complaining about the 50GB of space not being enough space. But that what you said about PS3 resorting to installing date onto the HDD for increased loading times is utter BS. What would any system want "increased loading times" for their games?[QUOTE="thekey"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]
saying uc2 and kz2 having the 'best graphics' is one thing, but saying the 360 cant handle them is something totally different
hardware-wise, the ps3 and 360 are pretty much equal.... making games with these kinds of graphics is all up to the dev, the hardware is there for both consoles
No there not equal. Thats like saying a diablo and a ferrari is equal. Both are cars that need gas to run but run very differently. Not possible. PS3 is a best now the people are starting to recongize it. The games are of higher quality than the 360's. Thats why the PS3 is now starting to sell so well.um... yeah... are you sure the reason its been selling relatively well wasnt cause the recent price drop? not the games?
The reasons for the increase in sales is because of price drop and the recent game releases also.[QUOTE="neomatrix909"]
360 has been out a year longer than PS3 but PS3 is way ahead of them in graphics when it comes to exlusives. Uncharted 2 (and 1 lol) and Killzone 2, MGS4 are way superior in the graphics department. Gears 2 shows very little improvements and Halo ODST is laughable. Doesn't this confirm that developers are holding back on multiplatform games when it comes to the PS3?
They aren't exactly holding back the PS3, it's just that when you port a game from the 360 to the PS3, it doesn't take advantage of CPU and sacrifices must be made to get it running well without using the 7 SPE's.
Thats actually true. Most developers don't even use more than 2 SPEs when porting games from the 360.[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
[QUOTE="siddhu33"]
It probably will, Sony thinks that the PS3 can last for 10 years :lol:
They stated it was a 10 year console. That doesn't mean the PS4 won't release until that 10 year cycle has ended.
It will more than likely happen much like the PS2-PS3, as the PS2 is still supported.
The question is, can Sony even afford to match up with the X-Box 720 when they've now lost nearly 5 billion smackeroonies off of the gaming division? I also forgot to mention that if those 1st party devs give the same amount of time & money for both Killzone 2 & Uncharted 2 on the 360, it will look exactly the same on the 360.
No it wouldn't because the 360 and PS3 perform very differently and also the 360's storage media space is more limited. And compress files make for a reduction of High Deffinition quality.[QUOTE="thekey"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]No there not equal. Thats like saying a diablo and a ferrari is equal. Both are cars that need gas to run but run very differently. Not possible. PS3 is a best now the people are starting to recongize it. The games are of higher quality than the 360's. Thats why the PS3 is now starting to sell so well. Dude how big of a blind fanboy can you get. Their hardware is very, very similar. PS3 has 1 core with 7SPE's but can only use 5-6. A realitively weak GPU compared with the Xbox 360. On the other hand, Xbox 360 has 3 cores but no SPEs and a stronger GPU than PS3. The only difference is that devs can set the SPE's to do more work on graphics than gameplay stuff while the GPU on the xbox 360 handles all the graphicssaying uc2 and kz2 having the 'best graphics' is one thing, but saying the 360 cant handle them is something totally different
hardware-wise, the ps3 and 360 are pretty much equal.... making games with these kinds of graphics is all up to the dev, the hardware is there for both consoles
93soccer
Ok first of all the 360's 3 cores can't do the amount of work the 7spe cell can do. 2nd of all the proof is in the games. PS3 only games have better AI. and more things happen on screen at once. Uncharted 2 has 30 different animations on each character perlevel/map. With each character having 30million polygons.(Something else the 360 can't acheive.) That being said. In Uncharted 2 you may have 20-30 enimies on the screen at once. Also to the PS3's video card is supperior to the 360's ATI raytheon crap. 360 doesn't have a stronger GPU. How can that be possible You said it yourself that the PS3's GPU can do more work than the 360's. I've seen that it can. But not to say that the 360's GPU is weak. The Wii's GPU is weaker than all.
[QUOTE="Zaibach"]
I have seen nor played any game on my 360 that can attend the same class as U2 and KZ2. Both games have had over 100 reviews between them and they all say what I've just said
saying uc2 and kz2 having the 'best graphics' is one thing, but saying the 360 cant handle them is something totally different
hardware-wise, the ps3 and 360 are pretty much equal.... making games with these kinds of graphics is all up to the dev, the hardware is there for both consoles
No there not equal. Thats like saying a diablo and a ferrari is equal. Both are cars that need gas to run but run very differently. Not possible. PS3 is a best now the people are starting to recongize it. The games are of higher quality than the 360's. Thats why the PS3 is now starting to sell so well.Gears of War 2 was released a year after Uncharted 1 and Uncharted one still looks light years better than GoW 2. Also Killzone 2, Uncharted 2 does not use the Unreal 3 engine either. And Gears of war 3 can use the new Unreal 4 engine if they want too. the 360 wouldn't be able to utilize it fully anyways.Gears of War is like 2 years older than these two games and let's be honest, there isn't much difference in graphics (imoGears beats both)and do you know why? Because Gears was the first game to push forward in the new engine (Unreal 3) which is the engine UC2/KZ2 use, if it wasn't for Gears you'd be still having fun with PS2 graphics. Oh and btw, Gears 3 is including the Unreal 4 engine which has never been used before again, so PS3 fanboys - let's boost your tech for you once more :)
Anthropology
Log in to comment