@gamingfan: I've been a harsh critic of Nintendo for almost 15 years, and I'm getting a Switch, so yea, no.

@simplytheebest: You bought an XB1 for $500, you can't be that smart.

@simplytheebest: Sony is bathing in MS blood when it comes to "place" in console sales. Scorpio will change nothing.

@sladakrobot: Did you read my entire comment?

Doesn't sound like it lol

@Pelezinho777: Their answer? They don't need an answer when they've doubled the sales of the XB1.

@datriax: Sony and MS aren't competing with Nintendo, even when the Wii was killing/murdering and bathing in their blood, the focus was still "Sony vs MS" at the time.

Gaming PC, PS4, Switch, and an XB1S as a 4K Bluray player.

Who needs a Scorpio with that combo?

@gottago42: Nintendo isn't concerned with having the most powerful hardware, they've made that abundantly clear for nearly 15 years now.

@Mirimon78: Just read an article at Eurogamer saying that it is indeed under XB1 and PS4 performance, and just barely below Shield performance in how it's currently running games, but they also stated it's not even running anywhere near its full potential, so technically you're wrong, and you appear to be way off with your other comparisons, but why compare it to cell phones and iPads anyway, outside of contracts most cell phones and iPads can reach prices well over $300 and offer games nowhere near as good.

@Mirimon78: it's less powerful than a iPad and a Vita? Spec for spec proof of that?

I think you're wrong, and I think your reaching with all the downplaying you're doing.