@Pedro: Lmao good one, if one could only get something with a stimulus check, chances are they probably should have spent it on something else.

On a seperate note, man all those stimulus checks were a bad idea, can not believe the government was wasting money like that by giving employed people and people who make over $70k ish money. They should have targeted those who actually lost their jobs due to the pandemic and those who actually had a very low income (I mean 70k is not great either it's livable but will save very little especially if you have tuition loans, but say 40k, that would be tough). The pandemic was actually financial boom for many earners (since their spending fell, no more $200 eating out or vacations to places, or cost of commuting and eating out at work)

@mowgly1: Awww somebody is beating the same dead horse and grasping for straws. You mad because you are too poor to own more than just the PS5? How sad of a life it must be to be so poor (probably because you are dumb, lazy and have a crap job) that you can only afford one console even and have to be a fan boy due to jealousy even though consoles are so cheap...

@shadyacshuns: Calls 120FPS nerdy, yet is on a gaming forum, and has an anime avatar lol.

That being said, for console 60FPS should be enough, as most console player's do not yet have 120FPS displays, and although the difference between 60 and 120 is massive, its not as important in console style games (say Assassins Creed) and really comes more into play in FPS's more than anything. Furthermore, obviously you have to make a sacrifice, resolution vs FPS. On the other hand, 30FPS is simply not enough and if you believe that, you are simply lying to yourself.

@estrowin: Lmao love how someone who uses a cheap console instead of a proper gaming rig (lets be honest, PC gaming is more expensive than console gaming, then again quite easy to be more expensive than a cheap $500 box, I am not saying PC gaming is expensive since even 1000 or 2000 is affordable imo when you view think of how many years and hours of use you will get out of your PC, but still) uses "you get what you pay for" as an argument for why console is better...dumbest thing I have heard today.

1. Yes pretty much BC with everything, and there are workaround for things should there be issues (hell you can even play retro console titles)

2. PC has both quantity and quality so this is a dumb argument

3. Mods are great, is it always click and go, no, but there are some amazing mods out there. But again spoken like someone who has never tried it. And hey its free, why not?

4. Frankly this sentence, and the way you type (I guess your grammar overall) suggests to me that you are a kid yourself. Adults are more likely to be PC gamers, simply due to the cost of gaming and building rigs being a hobby. Furthermore, over the year's the number of "headaches" that you get with PC's have come down (can not think of any tbh) while amount of headaches you get with consoles have increase (before in PS2 era you did not have to update, now you do, for example). The two "systems" have very much so converged in some of their complexity imo. That being said, I will say both the console and PC community online can be both pleasant, and toxic online.

5. What a dumb comment, open is good, not bad, moron.

6. Free online, where you actually get dedicated servers. Something quite a few MP console games did not have until last generation (looking at CoD...)

To conclude, don't knocksomething that you have not triedby providing baseless statements just because you can not afford it.(using this argument since you did say, you get what you pay for...)

A few of my favorite ones so far (in no particular order): The Witcher 3, Halo The Master Chief Collection, Uncharted 4, Battlefield V/BF 1 (some of the songs them are amazing)

The document does say "subject to material technical limitations" which I interpret as make it run as well as possible on our system can run it, and it's OK if it looks better on a more powerful platform (PC, XSX) as long as the reason for it looking better on another system is that the system is more powerful (and not because it got a more favorable treatment). Seems fine to me tbh

@mowgly1: Please do show a few links to places where it is not sold out (and by that I mean actual retailers, not eBay or 3rd party sellers on Amazon scalping). Otherwise at this point I see a pathetic fan boy who can only afford one system capping on the others because he doesn't have them

@latech84: To be fair the 3060ti performs quite close to the 3070 for $400 (msrp of course). The GTX 1070 came out for $380 (once you account for inflation its $420 in today's dollars. So to be fair the 3060ti is cheaper than what gtx 1070 came out for, and the 3070 is oy $80 more. Of course lol this all assumes msrp. And seeing how cards are selling for crazy prices I don't know if even when availability is back, whether prices will come back down. Hell the aib's themselves are charging scalper prices (kinda)

@HalcyonScarlet: Honestly I do not think it is that slow (compared to other regular HDDs) its more of a perception thing. In these videos when you are just watching them and seeing the time to load, it seems longer than when you are playing (at least that my take on it), or conversely you are realizing how long it takes with a regular hdd compared to an SSD. Do wish SSDs were a little cheaper though since on my PC a large portion of my library is still loaded of a regular external hdd (have a 4tb external connected) so the 2tb ssd's (1tbx2) I have are allocated just to the OS and stuff I use most frequently