
unholymight's forum posts

No, I wanted to estimate how far you're willing to go to win.[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="btstlouis"]
Chill, I'm 18. Just a guess, are you going to mock me for my supposed immaturity?
btstlouis
What does that mean?
I don't know, but I'm going to win a competition to find out.[QUOTE="Drakes_Fortune"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"] Are you sure you read that right? I thought that Planck was suggesting that there was a minimum traversible distance.jimmyjammer69
yes thats what i said. read my other post it was more clear, im getting sleepy and i might start to not make any sense.
It's quite possible you did say that. On a side point, the word "atom" literally means indivisible, and I think that the work of Planck was really an effort to restore faith in this idea that the universe is made up of identical, indivisible particles, and so is ultimately ordered and quantifiable. You've probably hit on something that whether there is a distance smaller than this Planck length is more something that we might never be able to know than a question already answered by his theories, and I guess this thread is a nice reminder that most of us laymen put quite a bit of faith in the idea that scientists probably know the answers without bothering to check whether it's always even possible. Planck's ideas were crucial to quantum physics; many theories are built on his constant. Unless you want to tell me an entire branch of physics is wrong.I take it you're going to ignore my question?[QUOTE="unholymight"][QUOTE="btstlouis"] I realize that winning at everything is not realistic, but trying is a necessity. Success will come with that.btstlouis
Chill, I'm 18. Just a guess, are you going to mock me for my supposed immaturity?
No, I wanted to estimate how far you're willing to go to win.
Log in to comment