[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="GalvatronType_R"]Hello, folks [bows deeply], this thread is dedicated to answering questions anyone feels like posting about HDTV, which TVs are good, cables, audio, etc., etc. So don't be shy, post a question and I'll try my best to answer it. I'll start with a few observations (most of these are IMOs, some are facts):
-expensive A/V cables, (Monster, Acoustic Research, et. al.) are the snake oil of the 21st century (if you don't believe me, look at the founder of Monster Cables's mansion, if that doesn't show that their products are overpriced and overrated, nothing will)
-not only has HD DVD won the first round vs. Blu-Ray, it won it in a landslide
-1080p is very, very overrated and is used as more of a marketing tool than an actual screen resolution
-don't make the mistake many others make, if you buy a decent display, dont't sell the audio side short, pair it with a phenomenal digital audio system
-for your own sakes, please don't buy Bose, if you have that much money to spend on audio, there are comparably priced, better-performing alternatives
So, again, post any questions, you'll get some semi-worthwhile answers.
GalvatronType_R
If you're going to be biased,whats the point of this thread?
We all know there is hardly any difference between Blu-ray and HD-DVD(only real difference is Blu-ray disc capacity which happens to be bigger),so if you feel some hatred towards Ps3's 1080p capabilities compared to Xbox 360's fake 1080p capabilities,I suggest you head on over to System Wars.
This has absolutely nothing to do with bias. Yes, BD and HD DVD are similar technologies but for the best picture quality at the best price RIGHT NOW, HD DVD is ahead of BD and that's an absolute fact. If you don't believe me, read Sound and Vision, Home Theater Review, various online HT sites, and other sources. They all come to the same conclusion that HD DVDs look better than comparable BDs. This is not an Sony vs. Microsoft issue (HD DVD is pushed by Toshiba, BTW).
"Right now" is somewhat immaterial as things are changing quickly with reference-quality BDs using high-bitrate MPEG2 on 50GB discs. And price is immaterial if you consider the fact that the PS3 can be had for $500 and is considered to be of better quality than the other 1st-gen Blu-Ray players. Why is everybody trying so hard to declare a winner now? The "war" has just barely begun. There aren't very many players on the market yet, and nobody cares besides the early adopters. Give it some time...
Log in to comment