@wladolfputler: Now this right here is ideal. over the top. Tells a message that relates to current events without saying a word. But still a creative and interesting edit.
Is that Trump running late for a Jeffrey Epstein party?
@wladolfputler: cutting out a face and lazily slapping it on another body is what I mean by "unclean layers".
That is what Reddit´s Meme-Artists are making, doing "funny" memes but sadly terribly suck at photoshop so they slam real funny text onto an utterly shitty photoshop, ending in half-assed memes so then you have half a million half-assed memes on reddit every week.
Considers myself as a "Photoshop Psychopath", i do things because i like doing them, if people love it then thats good and if they hate it thats fine as well.
Another aspect of my "Psycho Photoshops" is the fact that EVERYONE can be my victim. Most people think i am with the political left coz i am doing lots of trump-photoshops while making him look "funny" or "stupid", but thats what they want to think coz they can´t grasp what´s my actual motivation.
So to end this actual more or less irrelevant comment, i see Trump as the most interesting person to make photoshops of, i could do as well make some with biden too or any other politicians, but they´re all rather "boring", plus there is a real huge catalogue of emotional Trump-Expression-Pictures no other president actually has, most presidents look like having the same boring and stupid emotion on everyone of their pictures.
So would i vote Trump?
No, first of all i am not even American but most of all, Trump is a complete psycho narcissist, similiar to myself, but a person like i am or he actually is...a ticking´n toxic time-bomb, shouldn´t really lead a country.
Now i could discuss and argue for another 30 pages, but i actually just wanna show off my shops...if you allow....
Have you read and understood Schrödinger´s Cat? That´s quantum-physics and according to it, the past, presence and future are actually "co-existing" in terms of...well...quantum-physics!
I've heard that it's fascinating if that is true lets just say that means the simulation theory is probably correct.
There are probably hundreds of fascinating theories as to what "reality" actually may be, while the multiverse theory (in fact the bubble-multiverse theory, while there are multiverse theories with other "structures" like multi-dimensional etc.) is the one i am thinking could be real in the first place, with the "simulation-theory" being the least one possible.
I guess the theory about we living in a simulation, is based on the assumption that there already passed so much time that whenever there were people making a simulation like "this one", it already happened, rather than that we would be the first civiliztion to build such a simulation.
I was complimenting you on your blending. I appreciate that your not just slapping and actually trying to make it look clean. I guess I'm just looking at this from a "meme" angle and you might not be trying to make memes and that's cool too.
noticed a lot of what you seem to be doing is face swapping with no message. Which is cool if that's what you going for. But with a clean shop and a clever message you will gain more traction.
Was a friendly suggestion/critique.
It's funny to see trump's face on ET, or on a super muscular body. Just no meaning. Hope you don't take this as criticism. You obviously know how to photoshop, just think you could go further.
Take a hot topic, maybe a spicy current event people are talking about. Incorporate your shop into that in a clever way. That's what I meant by special.
I asked you one simple question as to how you´re spotting an "unclean layer" and you end up spilling your guts about everything but "unclean layers". Calm down!
Have you read and understood Schrödinger´s Cat? That´s quantum-physics and according to it, the past, presence and future are actually "co-existing" in terms of...well...quantum-physics!
@fenriz275 said:
I met this dude selling oranges under an overpass and he knew the answer.
I wasn´t asking any questions here but i do understand that you need attention and try it the funny way.
@palasta said:
Blah blah blah blah blah......
Does that mean that Dolly was actually un-conscious?
You obviously haven´t read much in this thread to this point and that is because you aren´t even interested, that much is obvious. I am just not sure whether it is because you are just looking for trouble or your IQ being on a cellar-deep level...or probably both.
You claim i am full of fairy tales and ask me dull questions? So i guess you love fairy tales after all and that is because of your infantile mind maybe?
Or is the reason for your presence in this thread something completely different maybe? It looks like your actual mission ain´t accomplished yet, so you´re still here even when you say i am just telling fairy tales.
Also...why did you just decided to join the discussion at this moment? I think you´re another user just being butthurt about "something", so live with it and move on, time will heal your wounds kid!
@wladolfputler: that what I meant, can't see them. They are clean, well blended
Can you see the first layer? How is an "unclean" layer supposed to look like?
Well you said i should work more on the humour/messaging in order to have something "special", so you must know more about it all than i do. So tell me more about photoshops, being funny and bringing great and meaningful messages! I wanna learn so that my work will be something....well...as you´re claiming....."special"!
But I noticed you said in another post that consciousness cannot store information - it can only observe.
I'm not so sure about that though, because there are numerous testimonies of people who have left their bodies (in NDE's and other ways) while still having memories of their Earthly selves.
Another great point you have there, showing that there in fact are users here who think about the subject rather than looking at my nickname/avatar and deciding to come here with their either half-assed theories but in fact just trying to hump-rape my leg.
Anyway, as you said, in my theory, consciousness can only observe but not store information (at least not in the same way as brain is storing memory). So what could there probably happen with those OBEs (out of the body experiences) or NDEs (near death experiences)?
Well this is not an easy to grasp turf! To begin with...are OBEs and NDEs actually the same or working the same way? What really happens, when such things are happening? Is "something" really "leaving the body" here or is this something the brain is experiencing? According to our great "scientists" out there, it is "just something" the brain is experiencing, as like it is producing some kind of chemical stuff similiar to a "drug", what causes "hallucinations".
Well if it is just "hallucinations" caused by the brain, why are having so many people the same "hallucination" then, aren´t they supposed to see different things rather than a tunnel or even better...sense/see/experience what´s actually happening in another room?
As to the question if consciousness is now capable of storing information or not, i just can´t see any reason as to why consciousness should do that, on the other hand...nothing is impossible and of course i could be wrong with several aspects in my theories or being completely wrong with everything to begin with!
Another question is, if consciousness is an "infinite" entity/energy-form and it would store information, it would store infinite information infinitely...which just seems kinda "awkward" to me, but then again there are other "awkward" theories from "scientists" (like we are living inside some simulation or somehow "inside some hologram") which could as well be true.
Only because we don´t understand something or think it actually makes no sense, doesn´t mean it can´t be real, so i am actually also saying that consciousness doesn´t makes sense at all, no matter how you see it, but then again only human beings always search for a meaning everywhere since their minds can´t grasp to just exist without any meaning or reason.
No, you´re of course not "but hurt", you´re butthurt, now "but hurt" and "butthurt" just aren´t the same as "identical twins" and "clones" aren´t. Are you by any chance slightly confused?
@MirkoS77 said:
I’m simply not going to engage with someone who conducts themselves in your manner.
LOL then please for god´s sake, save everyone your heartbreaking whining and just go back where you came from.
Log in to comment