It was over 72 hours, I was working on some final year University work nonstop after the hand in day walking back from Uni with a few friends I was random stuff. After that I slept for a whole day.
I think the biggest issue is hardly anyone really wants to play PS3 games on the go. Portable games are targeted for children or are quick play for bus travel.ActionRemix
That was my main problem with most PSP games, you couldn't really play them on the go due to the length and battery life. The games just aren't portable friendly.
The Officer could of simply walked away from the situation and actually thought through the situation before acting, look at the Officer a 5 year old is no threat to him at all. He should of had someone there that the kid trusted to help keep things calm.
Well in terms of the current notion of handhelds they will soon be dead, what with the rise in smart phones and Ipads etc there are more ways than ever to game on the go, for one handheld games are too exspensive and the hardware itself is too exspensive. As for inovation it happens every generation but currently we are nearing the end of this console generation so natrually things are slowing down, but to say there has been a lack of innovation or progression in the industry is an overreaction. Services such as Steam and Xbox Live have opened a gateway for smaller devs to reach the mainstream market just look at titles like Trails HD, Limbo and Super Meat Boy etc. There will always be innovation in the industry, people just overreact.
Honestly if you just owned a Wii then you missed out on a lot of games and online gaming. If you include the multiplatform games between the PS3 and 360 that don't appear on the Wii, the list of awesome games Wii owners are missing out on is huge.
If Iran or North Korea obtained nuclear weapons there would be mass destruction. They would use them..... I don't get why anyone thinks Iran or North Korea having nuclear weapons would turn out okay.
We used them in the past as a last resort and as another user said, the times have changed now and it is unfortunate that we did use them in the past
meetroid8
we didn't use them as a last resort, we use it to test it out, saying it was a last resort is BS. Also thats what i'm saying, us having nuclear weapons didn't turn out okay. Also, i'm just learning about this in great depth and i'm sure their is more to the story and why we used them and what happen during that war but i'm beginning to see things differently, but thats the point of college right? hah The very important point that you're missing is that the Japanese government didn't surrender after the first bomb was dropped. There was no other way the war could have been won besides a massive invasion, which would have resulted in many more civilian deaths. As bad as it sounds dropping the bombs was the better option, if that didn't happen many more lives would of been lost and the war could of potentionally lasted longer. I think it's fine that America is at the forefront trying to control nuclear weapons beause the country knows full well the results and devastation of these weapons. Plus times have changed things are a lot different now than back in the 40's, and even the cold war.
Log in to comment