[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"]generic?...not really...[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="MerisYaki"]Easily, not interested in generic shooters.
BIOWAREISKING
yeah really
explain?doesnt do anything new in the crowded shooter marketplace, boring war torn world, stale enemies, lack of a good hook, being hyped soley on its "good" graphics and its being made by a medicore dev.
it has 1st person cover system, thats pretttyyyyy new, its a cinimatic game, with cutscenes sliding in, only 1 other games does that like KZ2... Crysis, and as for the stale enemies and lack of good look im just going to have to say "no" bcz thats just wronglol 1st person cover that some have said was a little wonky,bioshock and fc2 have walk in cutscenes aswell, stale humaniod characters and now metal gears lol and it still doesnt have a good hook.
so by ur logic killswitch is generic?, though it wasnt a perfect 3rd person cover it was the 1st game to have one, but hey gears of war would be generic, bcz it just took killswitch and improved.... lolnever played or seen killswitch and didnt it get a 6.9 or something.
and i doubt you could name a 3rd person shooter as good and plays as smooth as gears.
gears is a killswitch clone...and now ur moving away from the fact killzone 2 is not genericand as for a 3rd person shooter that plays as good at gears, Killzone Liberation PSP, loads of fun, also has cover system
Log in to comment